| 51.132.243.207 |
attackspam |
Email rejected due to spam filtering |
2020-10-03 22:05:07 |
| 138.197.175.236 |
attack |
[N1.H1.VM1] Port Scanner Detected Blocked by UFW |
2020-10-03 22:06:06 |
| 185.233.117.102 |
attackspambots |
20 attempts against mh-ssh on ice |
2020-10-03 22:07:41 |
| 101.133.174.69 |
attackbots |
Automatic report - Banned IP Access |
2020-10-03 21:09:19 |
| 36.7.80.168 |
attackspam |
SCAN: Host Sweep CloudCIX Reconnaissance Scan Detected, PTR: PTR record not found |
2020-10-03 22:03:26 |
| 185.176.220.179 |
attackspambots |
RU spamvertising, health fraud - From: GlucaFIX
UBE 185.176.220.179 (EHLO gopxk.imkeeperr.com) 2 Cloud Ltd.
Spam link redfloppy.com = 185.246.116.174 Vpsville LLC – phishing redirect:
a) aptrk13.com = 35.204.93.160 Google
b) www.ep20trk.com = 34.120.202.146 Google
c) www.glucafix.us = 104.27.187.98, 104.27.186.98, 172.67.201.182 Cloudflare
d) glucafix.us = ditto
Images -
- http://redfloppy.com/web/imgs/mi1tb6fg.png = dailybetterhealth.com = 104.27.138.27, 104.27.139.27, 172.67.218.161 Cloudflare
- http://redfloppy.com/web/imgs/24sc48jt.png = unsub; no entity/address |
2020-10-03 21:57:58 |
| 182.126.87.169 |
attackbots |
DATE:2020-10-02 22:38:55, IP:182.126.87.169, PORT:telnet Telnet brute force auth on honeypot server (epe-honey1-hq) |
2020-10-03 20:57:47 |
| 1.255.48.197 |
attack |
(From annabelle@merchantpay.top) I have a quick question about working with your business. Like most business owners you just want to survive through to 2021. In order for that to happen you need to save every dollar possible right? This is an honest question, would you continue with the high credit card processing fees if there was another way? New laws are on your side. Test this newly released card processing model this October - just send a phone number and we'll call.
$24.99/mo Flat Fee Credit Card Processing (Unlimited)
1) As a small business owner accepting credit/debit, recently passed State Laws are on your side. - Were you aware?
New state regulations now in effect, the law was successfully passed in 46 states - effective since August 2019.
Since that date you shouldn't be paying above 0.75% Credit Card Processing Fees.
2) You're legally able to demand this new option.
Bottom Line: Your processor isn't telling you everything. Why are they hiding the lower fee options?
We repre |
2020-10-03 20:52:07 |
| 49.88.112.65 |
attack |
Oct 3 13:46:48 email sshd\[8402\]: pam_unix\(sshd:auth\): authentication failure\; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=49.88.112.65 user=root
Oct 3 13:46:50 email sshd\[8402\]: Failed password for root from 49.88.112.65 port 46663 ssh2
Oct 3 13:49:34 email sshd\[8860\]: pam_unix\(sshd:auth\): authentication failure\; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=49.88.112.65 user=root
Oct 3 13:49:36 email sshd\[8860\]: Failed password for root from 49.88.112.65 port 20484 ssh2
Oct 3 13:50:21 email sshd\[8998\]: pam_unix\(sshd:auth\): authentication failure\; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=49.88.112.65 user=root
... |
2020-10-03 21:56:32 |
| 46.101.8.39 |
attackbots |
20 attempts against mh-ssh on comet |
2020-10-03 20:58:32 |
| 112.238.151.20 |
attackspambots |
REQUESTED PAGE: /GponForm/diag_Form?images/ |
2020-10-03 21:11:47 |
| 74.120.14.78 |
attackbotsspam |
TCP (SYN) 74.120.14.78:19134 -> port 9441, len 44 |
2020-10-03 22:04:48 |
| 189.240.117.236 |
attackbots |
Oct 3 14:24:54 icinga sshd[40529]: pam_unix(sshd:auth): authentication failure; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=189.240.117.236
Oct 3 14:24:56 icinga sshd[40529]: Failed password for invalid user scaner from 189.240.117.236 port 54796 ssh2
Oct 3 14:36:26 icinga sshd[58302]: pam_unix(sshd:auth): authentication failure; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=189.240.117.236
... |
2020-10-03 21:57:24 |
| 61.155.2.142 |
attackspam |
Invalid user cedric from 61.155.2.142 port 41089 |
2020-10-03 20:58:15 |
| 195.133.56.185 |
attack |
(mod_security) mod_security (id:210730) triggered by 195.133.56.185 (CZ/Czechia/-): 5 in the last 300 secs |
2020-10-03 20:56:59 |