| 34.120.202.146 |
attackbots |
RU spamvertising, health fraud - From: GlucaFIX
UBE 185.176.220.179 (EHLO gopxk.imkeeperr.com) 2 Cloud Ltd.
Spam link redfloppy.com = 185.246.116.174 Vpsville LLC – phishing redirect:
a) aptrk13.com = 35.204.93.160 Google
b) www.ep20trk.com = 34.120.202.146 Google
c) www.glucafix.us = 104.27.187.98, 104.27.186.98, 172.67.201.182 Cloudflare
d) glucafix.us = ditto
Images -
- http://redfloppy.com/web/imgs/mi1tb6fg.png = dailybetterhealth.com = 104.27.138.27, 104.27.139.27, 172.67.218.161 Cloudflare
- http://redfloppy.com/web/imgs/24sc48jt.png = unsub; no entity/address |
2020-10-03 12:06:19 |
| 101.133.174.69 |
attackbotsspam |
101.133.174.69 - - [03/Oct/2020:01:07:05 +0200] "GET /wp-login.php HTTP/1.1" 200 9061 "-" "Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Ubuntu; Linux x86_64; rv:62.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/62.0"
101.133.174.69 - - [03/Oct/2020:01:07:09 +0200] "POST /wp-login.php HTTP/1.1" 200 9312 "-" "Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Ubuntu; Linux x86_64; rv:62.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/62.0"
101.133.174.69 - - [03/Oct/2020:01:07:12 +0200] "POST /xmlrpc.php HTTP/1.1" 200 427 "-" "Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Ubuntu; Linux x86_64; rv:62.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/62.0" |
2020-10-03 07:16:00 |
| 5.200.241.104 |
attackspam |
1601671289 - 10/02/2020 22:41:29 Host: 5.200.241.104/5.200.241.104 Port: 445 TCP Blocked |
2020-10-03 07:04:10 |
| 122.51.252.45 |
attack |
SSH Invalid Login |
2020-10-03 07:21:41 |
| 167.172.36.232 |
attack |
Oct 2 21:28:00 email sshd\[633\]: Invalid user unifi from 167.172.36.232
Oct 2 21:28:00 email sshd\[633\]: pam_unix\(sshd:auth\): authentication failure\; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=167.172.36.232
Oct 2 21:28:01 email sshd\[633\]: Failed password for invalid user unifi from 167.172.36.232 port 46238 ssh2
Oct 2 21:31:17 email sshd\[1223\]: Invalid user walter from 167.172.36.232
Oct 2 21:31:17 email sshd\[1223\]: pam_unix\(sshd:auth\): authentication failure\; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=167.172.36.232
... |
2020-10-03 12:10:22 |
| 170.0.160.165 |
attackbots |
Oct 2 16:27:05 cumulus sshd[22622]: Did not receive identification string from 170.0.160.165 port 56894
Oct 2 16:27:05 cumulus sshd[22624]: Did not receive identification string from 170.0.160.165 port 56901
Oct 2 16:27:05 cumulus sshd[22623]: Did not receive identification string from 170.0.160.165 port 56900
Oct 2 16:27:06 cumulus sshd[22625]: Did not receive identification string from 170.0.160.165 port 57113
Oct 2 16:27:06 cumulus sshd[22626]: Did not receive identification string from 170.0.160.165 port 57110
Oct 2 16:27:06 cumulus sshd[22627]: Did not receive identification string from 170.0.160.165 port 57122
Oct 2 16:27:06 cumulus sshd[22628]: Did not receive identification string from 170.0.160.165 port 57151
Oct 2 16:27:08 cumulus sshd[22631]: Invalid user guest from 170.0.160.165 port 57170
Oct 2 16:27:08 cumulus sshd[22634]: Invalid user guest from 170.0.160.165 port 57173
Oct 2 16:27:08 cumulus sshd[22632]: Invalid user guest from 170.0.160.165 po........
------------------------------- |
2020-10-03 06:57:56 |
| 129.211.73.2 |
attackbots |
3x Failed Password |
2020-10-03 07:09:32 |
| 1.255.48.197 |
attack |
(From annabelle@merchantpay.top) I have a quick question about working with your business. Like most business owners you just want to survive through to 2021. In order for that to happen you need to save every dollar possible right? This is an honest question, would you continue with the high credit card processing fees if there was another way? New laws are on your side. Test this newly released card processing model this October - just send a phone number and we'll call.
$24.99/mo Flat Fee Credit Card Processing (Unlimited)
1) As a small business owner accepting credit/debit, recently passed State Laws are on your side. - Were you aware?
New state regulations now in effect, the law was successfully passed in 46 states - effective since August 2019.
Since that date you shouldn't be paying above 0.75% Credit Card Processing Fees.
2) You're legally able to demand this new option.
Bottom Line: Your processor isn't telling you everything. Why are they hiding the lower fee options?
We repre |
2020-10-03 06:58:51 |
| 211.220.27.191 |
attackbotsspam |
Invalid user jboss from 211.220.27.191 port 55634 |
2020-10-03 06:56:03 |
| 61.133.232.253 |
attack |
2020-10-03T05:25:55.716294vps773228.ovh.net sshd[1872]: Invalid user teste from 61.133.232.253 port 9428
2020-10-03T05:25:55.729431vps773228.ovh.net sshd[1872]: pam_unix(sshd:auth): authentication failure; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=61.133.232.253
2020-10-03T05:25:55.716294vps773228.ovh.net sshd[1872]: Invalid user teste from 61.133.232.253 port 9428
2020-10-03T05:25:57.226373vps773228.ovh.net sshd[1872]: Failed password for invalid user teste from 61.133.232.253 port 9428 ssh2
2020-10-03T05:34:12.163060vps773228.ovh.net sshd[1912]: Invalid user michael from 61.133.232.253 port 39112
... |
2020-10-03 12:13:07 |
| 140.143.207.57 |
attackbots |
SSH Invalid Login |
2020-10-03 07:12:42 |
| 122.14.228.229 |
attackbots |
Oct 3 00:36:23 ns381471 sshd[21588]: pam_unix(sshd:auth): authentication failure; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=122.14.228.229
Oct 3 00:36:25 ns381471 sshd[21588]: Failed password for invalid user alex from 122.14.228.229 port 33060 ssh2 |
2020-10-03 07:17:50 |
| 111.198.48.204 |
attackbotsspam |
Oct 2 16:43:41 Tower sshd[28959]: Connection from 111.198.48.204 port 53972 on 192.168.10.220 port 22 rdomain ""
Oct 2 16:43:45 Tower sshd[28959]: Invalid user test from 111.198.48.204 port 53972
Oct 2 16:43:45 Tower sshd[28959]: error: Could not get shadow information for NOUSER
Oct 2 16:43:45 Tower sshd[28959]: Failed password for invalid user test from 111.198.48.204 port 53972 ssh2
Oct 2 16:43:45 Tower sshd[28959]: Received disconnect from 111.198.48.204 port 53972:11: Bye Bye [preauth]
Oct 2 16:43:45 Tower sshd[28959]: Disconnected from invalid user test 111.198.48.204 port 53972 [preauth] |
2020-10-03 12:03:05 |
| 129.28.187.169 |
attackbots |
Time: Fri Oct 2 22:48:02 2020 +0200
IP: 129.28.187.169 (CN/China/-)
Failures: 5 (sshd)
Interval: 3600 seconds
Blocked: Permanent Block [LF_SSHD]
Log entries:
Oct 2 22:39:37 3-1 sshd[17808]: Invalid user testbed from 129.28.187.169 port 56400
Oct 2 22:39:39 3-1 sshd[17808]: Failed password for invalid user testbed from 129.28.187.169 port 56400 ssh2
Oct 2 22:46:55 3-1 sshd[18148]: Invalid user test from 129.28.187.169 port 35896
Oct 2 22:46:56 3-1 sshd[18148]: Failed password for invalid user test from 129.28.187.169 port 35896 ssh2
Oct 2 22:48:00 3-1 sshd[18183]: pam_unix(sshd:auth): authentication failure; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=129.28.187.169 user=root |
2020-10-03 07:13:36 |
| 83.239.38.2 |
attackbots |
Oct 2 22:05:50 vlre-nyc-1 sshd\[10981\]: pam_unix\(sshd:auth\): authentication failure\; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=83.239.38.2 user=root
Oct 2 22:05:52 vlre-nyc-1 sshd\[10981\]: Failed password for root from 83.239.38.2 port 42316 ssh2
Oct 2 22:08:32 vlre-nyc-1 sshd\[11051\]: Invalid user dcadmin from 83.239.38.2
Oct 2 22:08:32 vlre-nyc-1 sshd\[11051\]: pam_unix\(sshd:auth\): authentication failure\; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=83.239.38.2
Oct 2 22:08:34 vlre-nyc-1 sshd\[11051\]: Failed password for invalid user dcadmin from 83.239.38.2 port 60788 ssh2
... |
2020-10-03 07:00:47 |