City: New Albany
Region: Indiana
Country: United States
Internet Service Provider: AT&T
Hostname: unknown
Organization: unknown
Usage Type: unknown
b
; <<>> DiG 9.10.3-P4-Ubuntu <<>> 107.131.139.52
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NXDOMAIN, id: 24209
;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 1, ADDITIONAL: 1
;; OPT PSEUDOSECTION:
; EDNS: version: 0, flags:; udp: 4096
;; QUESTION SECTION:
;107.131.139.52. IN A
;; AUTHORITY SECTION:
. 160 IN SOA a.root-servers.net. nstld.verisign-grs.com. 2020042702 1800 900 604800 86400
;; Query time: 148 msec
;; SERVER: 183.60.83.19#53(183.60.83.19)
;; WHEN: Tue Apr 28 06:51:10 CST 2020
;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 118
52.139.131.107.in-addr.arpa domain name pointer 107-131-139-52.lightspeed.lsvlky.sbcglobal.net.
Server: 183.60.83.19
Address: 183.60.83.19#53
Non-authoritative answer:
52.139.131.107.in-addr.arpa name = 107-131-139-52.lightspeed.lsvlky.sbcglobal.net.
Authoritative answers can be found from:
IP | Type | Details | Datetime |
---|---|---|---|
1.255.48.197 | attack | (From annabelle@merchantpay.top) I have a quick question about working with your business. Like most business owners you just want to survive through to 2021. In order for that to happen you need to save every dollar possible right? This is an honest question, would you continue with the high credit card processing fees if there was another way? New laws are on your side. Test this newly released card processing model this October - just send a phone number and we'll call. $24.99/mo Flat Fee Credit Card Processing (Unlimited) 1) As a small business owner accepting credit/debit, recently passed State Laws are on your side. - Were you aware? New state regulations now in effect, the law was successfully passed in 46 states - effective since August 2019. Since that date you shouldn't be paying above 0.75% Credit Card Processing Fees. 2) You're legally able to demand this new option. Bottom Line: Your processor isn't telling you everything. Why are they hiding the lower fee options? We repre |
2020-10-03 20:52:07 |
64.225.11.24 | attackbotsspam | Invalid user admin from 64.225.11.24 port 41874 |
2020-10-03 20:20:26 |
78.188.173.73 | attackbotsspam | 1601670755 - 10/03/2020 03:32:35 Host: 78.188.173.73.static.ttnet.com.tr/78.188.173.73 Port: 23 TCP Blocked ... |
2020-10-03 20:32:20 |
180.76.118.175 | attack | SSH login attempts. |
2020-10-03 20:26:53 |
83.233.41.228 | attack | Invalid user eversec from 83.233.41.228 port 8363 |
2020-10-03 20:38:36 |
176.109.184.235 | attack | Automated report (2020-10-03T00:30:09+02:00). Spambot detected. |
2020-10-03 20:44:20 |
111.198.48.204 | attackspambots | Oct 2 16:43:41 Tower sshd[28959]: Connection from 111.198.48.204 port 53972 on 192.168.10.220 port 22 rdomain "" Oct 2 16:43:45 Tower sshd[28959]: Invalid user test from 111.198.48.204 port 53972 Oct 2 16:43:45 Tower sshd[28959]: error: Could not get shadow information for NOUSER Oct 2 16:43:45 Tower sshd[28959]: Failed password for invalid user test from 111.198.48.204 port 53972 ssh2 Oct 2 16:43:45 Tower sshd[28959]: Received disconnect from 111.198.48.204 port 53972:11: Bye Bye [preauth] Oct 2 16:43:45 Tower sshd[28959]: Disconnected from invalid user test 111.198.48.204 port 53972 [preauth] |
2020-10-03 20:37:53 |
27.151.115.81 | attack | [MK-VM2] Blocked by UFW |
2020-10-03 20:48:57 |
220.186.173.217 | attackbotsspam | Oct 1 10:14:41 cumulus sshd[30270]: Invalid user liuhao from 220.186.173.217 port 54886 Oct 1 10:14:41 cumulus sshd[30270]: pam_unix(sshd:auth): authentication failure; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=220.186.173.217 Oct 1 10:14:44 cumulus sshd[30270]: Failed password for invalid user liuhao from 220.186.173.217 port 54886 ssh2 Oct 1 10:14:44 cumulus sshd[30270]: Received disconnect from 220.186.173.217 port 54886:11: Bye Bye [preauth] Oct 1 10:14:44 cumulus sshd[30270]: Disconnected from 220.186.173.217 port 54886 [preauth] Oct 1 10:17:22 cumulus sshd[30517]: pam_unix(sshd:auth): authentication failure; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=220.186.173.217 user=r.r Oct 1 10:17:24 cumulus sshd[30517]: Failed password for r.r from 220.186.173.217 port 53282 ssh2 Oct 1 10:17:24 cumulus sshd[30517]: Received disconnect from 220.186.173.217 port 53282:11: Bye Bye [preauth] Oct 1 10:17:24 cumulus sshd[30517]: Disconnected from 220.186.173.217 port 5........ ------------------------------- |
2020-10-03 20:27:18 |
131.196.216.39 | attack | 20 attempts against mh-ssh on ice |
2020-10-03 20:46:01 |
46.101.1.38 | attackspambots | 20 attempts against mh-ssh on oak |
2020-10-03 20:12:23 |
159.89.188.167 | attackspam | SSH login attempts. |
2020-10-03 20:28:04 |
182.254.195.46 | attack | Invalid user dspace from 182.254.195.46 port 36834 |
2020-10-03 20:52:29 |
208.109.13.144 | attackbots | Invalid user yt from 208.109.13.144 port 39024 |
2020-10-03 20:08:47 |
123.31.45.49 | attackbots | Invalid user download from 123.31.45.49 port 57606 |
2020-10-03 20:30:17 |