Must be a valid IPv4 or IPv6 ip address, e.g. 127.0.0.1 or 2001:DB8:0:0:8:800:200C:417A
Basic Info

City: New Albany

Region: Indiana

Country: United States

Internet Service Provider: AT&T

Hostname: unknown

Organization: unknown

Usage Type: unknown

Comments:
No discussion about this IP yet. Click above link to make one.
Comments on same subnet:
No discussion about this subnet yet..
Whois info:
b
Dig info:
; <<>> DiG 9.10.3-P4-Ubuntu <<>> 107.131.139.52
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NXDOMAIN, id: 24209
;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 1, ADDITIONAL: 1

;; OPT PSEUDOSECTION:
; EDNS: version: 0, flags:; udp: 4096
;; QUESTION SECTION:
;107.131.139.52.			IN	A

;; AUTHORITY SECTION:
.			160	IN	SOA	a.root-servers.net. nstld.verisign-grs.com. 2020042702 1800 900 604800 86400

;; Query time: 148 msec
;; SERVER: 183.60.83.19#53(183.60.83.19)
;; WHEN: Tue Apr 28 06:51:10 CST 2020
;; MSG SIZE  rcvd: 118
Host info
52.139.131.107.in-addr.arpa domain name pointer 107-131-139-52.lightspeed.lsvlky.sbcglobal.net.
Nslookup info:
Server:		183.60.83.19
Address:	183.60.83.19#53

Non-authoritative answer:
52.139.131.107.in-addr.arpa	name = 107-131-139-52.lightspeed.lsvlky.sbcglobal.net.

Authoritative answers can be found from:
Related IP info:
Related comments:
IP Type Details Datetime
1.255.48.197 attack
(From annabelle@merchantpay.top) I have a quick question about working with your business. Like most business owners you just want to survive through to 2021. In order for that to happen you need to save every dollar possible right? This is an honest question, would you continue with the high credit card processing fees if there was another way?  New laws are on your side. Test this newly released card processing model this October -  just send a phone number and we'll call.

$24.99/mo Flat Fee Credit Card Processing (Unlimited)

1) As a small business owner accepting credit/debit, recently passed State Laws are on your side. - Were you aware? 
New state regulations now in effect, the law was successfully passed in 46 states - effective since August 2019. 

Since that date you shouldn't be paying above 0.75% Credit Card Processing Fees. 
2) You're legally able to demand this new option. 

Bottom Line: Your processor isn't telling you everything. Why are they hiding the lower fee options?

We repre
2020-10-03 20:52:07
64.225.11.24 attackbotsspam
Invalid user admin from 64.225.11.24 port 41874
2020-10-03 20:20:26
78.188.173.73 attackbotsspam
1601670755 - 10/03/2020 03:32:35 Host: 78.188.173.73.static.ttnet.com.tr/78.188.173.73 Port: 23 TCP Blocked
...
2020-10-03 20:32:20
180.76.118.175 attack
SSH login attempts.
2020-10-03 20:26:53
83.233.41.228 attack
Invalid user eversec from 83.233.41.228 port 8363
2020-10-03 20:38:36
176.109.184.235 attack
Automated report (2020-10-03T00:30:09+02:00). Spambot detected.
2020-10-03 20:44:20
111.198.48.204 attackspambots
Oct  2 16:43:41 Tower sshd[28959]: Connection from 111.198.48.204 port 53972 on 192.168.10.220 port 22 rdomain ""
Oct  2 16:43:45 Tower sshd[28959]: Invalid user test from 111.198.48.204 port 53972
Oct  2 16:43:45 Tower sshd[28959]: error: Could not get shadow information for NOUSER
Oct  2 16:43:45 Tower sshd[28959]: Failed password for invalid user test from 111.198.48.204 port 53972 ssh2
Oct  2 16:43:45 Tower sshd[28959]: Received disconnect from 111.198.48.204 port 53972:11: Bye Bye [preauth]
Oct  2 16:43:45 Tower sshd[28959]: Disconnected from invalid user test 111.198.48.204 port 53972 [preauth]
2020-10-03 20:37:53
27.151.115.81 attack
[MK-VM2] Blocked by UFW
2020-10-03 20:48:57
220.186.173.217 attackbotsspam
Oct  1 10:14:41 cumulus sshd[30270]: Invalid user liuhao from 220.186.173.217 port 54886
Oct  1 10:14:41 cumulus sshd[30270]: pam_unix(sshd:auth): authentication failure; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=220.186.173.217
Oct  1 10:14:44 cumulus sshd[30270]: Failed password for invalid user liuhao from 220.186.173.217 port 54886 ssh2
Oct  1 10:14:44 cumulus sshd[30270]: Received disconnect from 220.186.173.217 port 54886:11: Bye Bye [preauth]
Oct  1 10:14:44 cumulus sshd[30270]: Disconnected from 220.186.173.217 port 54886 [preauth]
Oct  1 10:17:22 cumulus sshd[30517]: pam_unix(sshd:auth): authentication failure; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=220.186.173.217  user=r.r
Oct  1 10:17:24 cumulus sshd[30517]: Failed password for r.r from 220.186.173.217 port 53282 ssh2
Oct  1 10:17:24 cumulus sshd[30517]: Received disconnect from 220.186.173.217 port 53282:11: Bye Bye [preauth]
Oct  1 10:17:24 cumulus sshd[30517]: Disconnected from 220.186.173.217 port 5........
-------------------------------
2020-10-03 20:27:18
131.196.216.39 attack
20 attempts against mh-ssh on ice
2020-10-03 20:46:01
46.101.1.38 attackspambots
20 attempts against mh-ssh on oak
2020-10-03 20:12:23
159.89.188.167 attackspam
SSH login attempts.
2020-10-03 20:28:04
182.254.195.46 attack
Invalid user dspace from 182.254.195.46 port 36834
2020-10-03 20:52:29
208.109.13.144 attackbots
Invalid user yt from 208.109.13.144 port 39024
2020-10-03 20:08:47
123.31.45.49 attackbots
Invalid user download from 123.31.45.49 port 57606
2020-10-03 20:30:17

Recently Reported IPs

137.27.210.41 174.206.38.174 195.9.46.110 39.235.9.67
72.94.53.233 91.51.77.88 86.217.32.236 94.223.171.149
115.76.163.225 188.254.202.201 45.17.73.92 216.8.68.157
76.115.139.52 222.224.232.248 77.190.106.22 90.224.44.84
2.122.151.21 139.57.21.46 76.253.78.99 74.100.246.231