Must be a valid IPv4 or IPv6 ip address, e.g. 127.0.0.1 or 2001:DB8:0:0:8:800:200C:417A
Basic Info

City: unknown

Region: unknown

Country: Russian Federation

Internet Service Provider: unknown

Hostname: unknown

Organization: unknown

Usage Type: unknown

Comments:
No discussion about this IP yet. Click above link to make one.
Comments on same subnet:
No discussion about this subnet yet..
Whois info:
b
Dig info:
; <<>> DiG 9.10.3-P4-Ubuntu <<>> 109.195.135.240
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NXDOMAIN, id: 8838
;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 1, ADDITIONAL: 0

;; QUESTION SECTION:
;109.195.135.240.		IN	A

;; AUTHORITY SECTION:
.			418	IN	SOA	a.root-servers.net. nstld.verisign-grs.com. 2022040201 1800 900 604800 86400

;; Query time: 29 msec
;; SERVER: 183.60.83.19#53(183.60.83.19)
;; WHEN: Sun Apr 03 07:34:03 CST 2022
;; MSG SIZE  rcvd: 108
Host info
240.135.195.109.in-addr.arpa domain name pointer 109x195x135x240.static-business.kurgan.ertelecom.ru.
Nslookup info:
Server:		183.60.83.19
Address:	183.60.83.19#53

Non-authoritative answer:
240.135.195.109.in-addr.arpa	name = 109x195x135x240.static-business.kurgan.ertelecom.ru.

Authoritative answers can be found from:
Related IP info:
Related comments:
IP Type Details Datetime
1.255.48.197 attack
(From annabelle@merchantpay.top) I have a quick question about working with your business. Like most business owners you just want to survive through to 2021. In order for that to happen you need to save every dollar possible right? This is an honest question, would you continue with the high credit card processing fees if there was another way?  New laws are on your side. Test this newly released card processing model this October -  just send a phone number and we'll call.

$24.99/mo Flat Fee Credit Card Processing (Unlimited)

1) As a small business owner accepting credit/debit, recently passed State Laws are on your side. - Were you aware? 
New state regulations now in effect, the law was successfully passed in 46 states - effective since August 2019. 

Since that date you shouldn't be paying above 0.75% Credit Card Processing Fees. 
2) You're legally able to demand this new option. 

Bottom Line: Your processor isn't telling you everything. Why are they hiding the lower fee options?

We repre
2020-10-03 06:58:51
195.133.56.185 attackspambots
(mod_security) mod_security (id:210730) triggered by 195.133.56.185 (CZ/Czechia/-): 5 in the last 300 secs
2020-10-03 07:03:40
51.38.85.146 attackbots
[portscan] Port scan
2020-10-03 07:15:30
129.211.73.2 attackbots
3x Failed Password
2020-10-03 07:09:32
89.233.112.6 attackspambots
port scan and connect, tcp 23 (telnet)
2020-10-03 06:55:38
60.174.248.244 attackspam
[N10.H2.VM2] Port Scanner Detected Blocked by UFW
2020-10-03 07:07:43
167.99.66.74 attackbotsspam
$f2bV_matches
2020-10-03 07:21:01
170.0.160.165 attackbots
Oct  2 16:27:05 cumulus sshd[22622]: Did not receive identification string from 170.0.160.165 port 56894
Oct  2 16:27:05 cumulus sshd[22624]: Did not receive identification string from 170.0.160.165 port 56901
Oct  2 16:27:05 cumulus sshd[22623]: Did not receive identification string from 170.0.160.165 port 56900
Oct  2 16:27:06 cumulus sshd[22625]: Did not receive identification string from 170.0.160.165 port 57113
Oct  2 16:27:06 cumulus sshd[22626]: Did not receive identification string from 170.0.160.165 port 57110
Oct  2 16:27:06 cumulus sshd[22627]: Did not receive identification string from 170.0.160.165 port 57122
Oct  2 16:27:06 cumulus sshd[22628]: Did not receive identification string from 170.0.160.165 port 57151
Oct  2 16:27:08 cumulus sshd[22631]: Invalid user guest from 170.0.160.165 port 57170
Oct  2 16:27:08 cumulus sshd[22634]: Invalid user guest from 170.0.160.165 port 57173
Oct  2 16:27:08 cumulus sshd[22632]: Invalid user guest from 170.0.160.165 po........
-------------------------------
2020-10-03 06:57:56
140.143.207.57 attackbots
SSH Invalid Login
2020-10-03 07:12:42
122.14.228.229 attackbots
Oct  3 00:36:23 ns381471 sshd[21588]: pam_unix(sshd:auth): authentication failure; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=122.14.228.229
Oct  3 00:36:25 ns381471 sshd[21588]: Failed password for invalid user alex from 122.14.228.229 port 33060 ssh2
2020-10-03 07:17:50
41.207.7.240 attackspambots
Lines containing failures of 41.207.7.240
Oct  2 22:24:45 new sshd[31337]: Did not receive identification string from 41.207.7.240 port 57604
Oct  2 22:24:45 new sshd[31338]: Did not receive identification string from 41.207.7.240 port 57607
Oct  2 22:24:48 new sshd[31341]: Did not receive identification string from 41.207.7.240 port 57651
Oct  2 22:24:48 new sshd[31339]: Invalid user dircreate from 41.207.7.240 port 57884
Oct  2 22:24:48 new sshd[31339]: pam_unix(sshd:auth): authentication failure; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=41.207.7.240
Oct  2 22:24:50 new sshd[31339]: Failed password for invalid user dircreate from 41.207.7.240 port 57884 ssh2
Oct  2 22:24:50 new sshd[31343]: Invalid user dircreate from 41.207.7.240 port 57893
Oct  2 22:24:50 new sshd[31343]: pam_unix(sshd:auth): authentication failure; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=41.207.7.240
Oct  2 22:24:50 new sshd[31339]: Connection closed by invalid user dircreate 41.207.7.240 port ........
------------------------------
2020-10-03 12:07:22
103.57.220.28 attackspambots
WordPress wp-login brute force :: 103.57.220.28 0.076 BYPASS [02/Oct/2020:20:41:24  0000] [censored_2] "POST /wp-login.php HTTP/1.1" 200 2577 "-" "Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Ubuntu; Linux x86_64; rv:62.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/62.0"
2020-10-03 07:05:44
46.101.7.67 attackbotsspam
2020-10-02T22:45:43.647446amanda2.illicoweb.com sshd\[31057\]: Invalid user eduardo from 46.101.7.67 port 55512
2020-10-02T22:45:43.652871amanda2.illicoweb.com sshd\[31057\]: pam_unix\(sshd:auth\): authentication failure\; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=46.101.7.67
2020-10-02T22:45:45.384843amanda2.illicoweb.com sshd\[31057\]: Failed password for invalid user eduardo from 46.101.7.67 port 55512 ssh2
2020-10-02T22:50:11.984213amanda2.illicoweb.com sshd\[31426\]: Invalid user fernando from 46.101.7.67 port 39966
2020-10-02T22:50:11.989521amanda2.illicoweb.com sshd\[31426\]: pam_unix\(sshd:auth\): authentication failure\; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=46.101.7.67
...
2020-10-03 07:14:09
84.208.227.60 attack
Invalid user mininet from 84.208.227.60 port 58162
2020-10-03 07:03:15
112.238.151.20 attackbots
REQUESTED PAGE: /GponForm/diag_Form?images/
2020-10-03 07:18:38

Recently Reported IPs

109.194.62.90 109.195.245.205 109.195.47.217 109.196.118.40
109.196.130.178 109.196.130.254 109.196.135.173 189.75.63.240
109.196.135.219 109.196.135.228 109.196.136.193 143.178.10.228
109.196.137.196 109.196.137.73 109.196.138.111 109.196.141.137
109.196.141.97 109.196.142.53 109.196.148.34 109.196.41.168