| 222.186.180.130 |
attackspambots |
Oct 3 22:49:59 theomazars sshd[14242]: pam_unix(sshd:auth): authentication failure; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=222.186.180.130 user=root
Oct 3 22:50:01 theomazars sshd[14242]: Failed password for root from 222.186.180.130 port 14879 ssh2 |
2020-10-04 04:51:49 |
| 176.109.184.235 |
attackbots |
Automated report (2020-10-03T00:30:09+02:00). Spambot detected. |
2020-10-04 04:37:50 |
| 190.36.156.72 |
attackspam |
Unauthorised access (Oct 2) SRC=190.36.156.72 LEN=52 TTL=116 ID=7606 DF TCP DPT=445 WINDOW=8192 SYN |
2020-10-04 04:55:45 |
| 134.209.153.36 |
attackspam |
Oct 3 14:41:22 mout sshd[12511]: Invalid user rg from 134.209.153.36 port 38328
Oct 3 14:41:24 mout sshd[12511]: Failed password for invalid user rg from 134.209.153.36 port 38328 ssh2
Oct 3 14:41:24 mout sshd[12511]: Disconnected from invalid user rg 134.209.153.36 port 38328 [preauth] |
2020-10-04 04:32:43 |
| 185.202.1.99 |
attackbots |
Fail2Ban Ban Triggered |
2020-10-04 04:22:28 |
| 139.59.161.78 |
attack |
Oct 3 20:19:22 plex-server sshd[3105136]: Failed password for invalid user cat from 139.59.161.78 port 58268 ssh2
Oct 3 20:22:55 plex-server sshd[3106801]: Invalid user test from 139.59.161.78 port 13600
Oct 3 20:22:55 plex-server sshd[3106801]: pam_unix(sshd:auth): authentication failure; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=139.59.161.78
Oct 3 20:22:55 plex-server sshd[3106801]: Invalid user test from 139.59.161.78 port 13600
Oct 3 20:22:57 plex-server sshd[3106801]: Failed password for invalid user test from 139.59.161.78 port 13600 ssh2
... |
2020-10-04 04:33:30 |
| 177.73.2.57 |
attackspambots |
Failed password for invalid user usuario from 177.73.2.57 port 42940 ssh2 |
2020-10-04 04:21:15 |
| 154.209.253.241 |
attackspam |
SSH bruteforce |
2020-10-04 04:56:37 |
| 14.200.208.244 |
attack |
2020-10-03T14:40:10+0000 Failed SSH Authentication/Brute Force Attack. (Server 6) |
2020-10-04 04:55:25 |
| 103.253.174.80 |
attack |
Cowrie Honeypot: Unauthorised SSH/Telnet login attempt with user "avanthi" at 2020-10-02T20:42:00Z |
2020-10-04 04:29:38 |
| 199.187.211.101 |
attackbots |
4,12-01/02 [bc00/m26] PostRequest-Spammer scoring: paris |
2020-10-04 04:31:13 |
| 61.97.248.227 |
attackspambots |
2020-10-03T22:22:16+0200 Failed SSH Authentication/Brute Force Attack. (Server 4) |
2020-10-04 04:36:01 |
| 103.246.240.30 |
attackspam |
Oct 3 17:54:05 vpn01 sshd[24482]: pam_unix(sshd:auth): authentication failure; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=103.246.240.30
Oct 3 17:54:07 vpn01 sshd[24482]: Failed password for invalid user ts from 103.246.240.30 port 48234 ssh2
... |
2020-10-04 04:39:53 |
| 34.120.202.146 |
attack |
RU spamvertising, health fraud - From: GlucaFIX
UBE 185.176.220.179 (EHLO gopxk.imkeeperr.com) 2 Cloud Ltd.
Spam link redfloppy.com = 185.246.116.174 Vpsville LLC – phishing redirect:
a) aptrk13.com = 35.204.93.160 Google
b) www.ep20trk.com = 34.120.202.146 Google
c) www.glucafix.us = 104.27.187.98, 104.27.186.98, 172.67.201.182 Cloudflare
d) glucafix.us = ditto
Images -
- http://redfloppy.com/web/imgs/mi1tb6fg.png = dailybetterhealth.com = 104.27.138.27, 104.27.139.27, 172.67.218.161 Cloudflare
- http://redfloppy.com/web/imgs/24sc48jt.png = unsub; no entity/address |
2020-10-04 04:33:59 |
| 1.255.48.197 |
attackspambots |
(From annabelle@merchantpay.top) I have a quick question about working with your business. Like most business owners you just want to survive through to 2021. In order for that to happen you need to save every dollar possible right? This is an honest question, would you continue with the high credit card processing fees if there was another way? New laws are on your side. Test this newly released card processing model this October - just send a phone number and we'll call.
$24.99/mo Flat Fee Credit Card Processing (Unlimited)
1) As a small business owner accepting credit/debit, recently passed State Laws are on your side. - Were you aware?
New state regulations now in effect, the law was successfully passed in 46 states - effective since August 2019.
Since that date you shouldn't be paying above 0.75% Credit Card Processing Fees.
2) You're legally able to demand this new option.
Bottom Line: Your processor isn't telling you everything. Why are they hiding the lower fee options?
We repre |
2020-10-04 04:44:26 |