| 179.197.71.132 |
attackspambots |
1601671289 - 10/02/2020 22:41:29 Host: 179.197.71.132/179.197.71.132 Port: 445 TCP Blocked |
2020-10-04 04:47:33 |
| 103.57.220.28 |
attackspambots |
Attempt to hack Wordpress Login, XMLRPC or other login |
2020-10-04 04:51:00 |
| 52.191.166.171 |
attackspam |
(sshd) Failed SSH login from 52.191.166.171 (US/United States/-): 5 in the last 3600 secs; Ports: *; Direction: inout; Trigger: LF_SSHD; Logs: Oct 3 01:07:08 server2 sshd[29282]: pam_unix(sshd:auth): authentication failure; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=52.191.166.171 user=root
Oct 3 01:07:09 server2 sshd[29282]: Failed password for root from 52.191.166.171 port 35066 ssh2
Oct 3 01:17:55 server2 sshd[5392]: Invalid user gera from 52.191.166.171
Oct 3 01:17:55 server2 sshd[5392]: pam_unix(sshd:auth): authentication failure; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=52.191.166.171
Oct 3 01:17:57 server2 sshd[5392]: Failed password for invalid user gera from 52.191.166.171 port 34354 ssh2 |
2020-10-04 05:04:07 |
| 2.57.122.221 |
attack |
ssh brute force |
2020-10-04 04:45:20 |
| 80.90.82.70 |
attackspam |
Automatic report - Banned IP Access |
2020-10-04 05:07:19 |
| 170.0.160.165 |
attackspam |
Oct 2 16:27:05 cumulus sshd[22622]: Did not receive identification string from 170.0.160.165 port 56894
Oct 2 16:27:05 cumulus sshd[22624]: Did not receive identification string from 170.0.160.165 port 56901
Oct 2 16:27:05 cumulus sshd[22623]: Did not receive identification string from 170.0.160.165 port 56900
Oct 2 16:27:06 cumulus sshd[22625]: Did not receive identification string from 170.0.160.165 port 57113
Oct 2 16:27:06 cumulus sshd[22626]: Did not receive identification string from 170.0.160.165 port 57110
Oct 2 16:27:06 cumulus sshd[22627]: Did not receive identification string from 170.0.160.165 port 57122
Oct 2 16:27:06 cumulus sshd[22628]: Did not receive identification string from 170.0.160.165 port 57151
Oct 2 16:27:08 cumulus sshd[22631]: Invalid user guest from 170.0.160.165 port 57170
Oct 2 16:27:08 cumulus sshd[22634]: Invalid user guest from 170.0.160.165 port 57173
Oct 2 16:27:08 cumulus sshd[22632]: Invalid user guest from 170.0.160.165 po........
------------------------------- |
2020-10-04 04:43:49 |
| 72.180.73.137 |
attack |
2020-10-03T15:48:12.769410ks3355764 sshd[24643]: Invalid user ec2-user from 72.180.73.137 port 33820
2020-10-03T15:48:14.670685ks3355764 sshd[24643]: Failed password for invalid user ec2-user from 72.180.73.137 port 33820 ssh2
... |
2020-10-04 05:01:08 |
| 61.133.232.253 |
attackbotsspam |
Oct 3 22:07:05 marvibiene sshd[21522]: Failed password for root from 61.133.232.253 port 43093 ssh2
Oct 3 22:23:47 marvibiene sshd[22733]: pam_unix(sshd:auth): authentication failure; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=61.133.232.253
Oct 3 22:23:49 marvibiene sshd[22733]: Failed password for invalid user hath from 61.133.232.253 port 32957 ssh2 |
2020-10-04 04:40:42 |
| 35.204.93.160 |
attack |
RU spamvertising/fraud - From: Your Nail Fungus
- UBE 188.240.221.164 (EHLO digitaldreamss.org) Virtono Networks Srl - BLACKLISTED
- Spam link digitaldreamss.org = 188.240.221.161 Virtono Networks Srl – BLACKLISTED
- Spam link redfloppy.com = 185.246.116.174 Vpsville LLC – repetitive phishing redirect:
a) aptrk15.com = 35.204.93.160 Google
b) trck.fun = 104.18.35.68, 104.18.34.68, 172.67.208.63 Cloudflare
c) muw.agileconnection.company = 107.179.2.229 Global Frag Networks (common with multiple spam series)
d) effective URL: www.google.com
Images - 185.246.116.174 Vpsville LLC
- http://redfloppy.com/web/imgs/j2cp9tu3.png = link to health fraud video
- http://redfloppy.com/web/imgs/ugqwjele.png = unsubscribe; no entity/address |
2020-10-04 04:53:26 |
| 209.159.155.70 |
attackspambots |
Invalid user slave from 209.159.155.70 port 43382 |
2020-10-04 04:42:35 |
| 188.166.178.42 |
attack |
2020-10-03T20:56:11.781414shield sshd\[18569\]: Invalid user ftpuser from 188.166.178.42 port 38880
2020-10-03T20:56:11.788042shield sshd\[18569\]: pam_unix\(sshd:auth\): authentication failure\; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=188.166.178.42
2020-10-03T20:56:13.950898shield sshd\[18569\]: Failed password for invalid user ftpuser from 188.166.178.42 port 38880 ssh2
2020-10-03T21:00:12.648132shield sshd\[18898\]: Invalid user admin from 188.166.178.42 port 47608
2020-10-03T21:00:12.656530shield sshd\[18898\]: pam_unix\(sshd:auth\): authentication failure\; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=188.166.178.42 |
2020-10-04 05:06:33 |
| 182.254.195.46 |
attackspam |
2020-10-03T03:21:23.160334hostname sshd[49089]: Failed password for invalid user ai from 182.254.195.46 port 35868 ssh2
... |
2020-10-04 04:44:56 |
| 152.136.97.217 |
attackbots |
Oct 2 20:24:59 Server1 sshd[17048]: Invalid user wellington from 152.136.97.217 port 52798
Oct 2 20:24:59 Server1 sshd[17048]: pam_unix(sshd:auth): authentication failure; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=152.136.97.217
Oct 2 20:25:01 Server1 sshd[17048]: Failed password for invalid user wellington from 152.136.97.217 port 52798 ssh2
Oct 2 20:25:01 Server1 sshd[17048]: Connection closed by invalid user wellington 152.136.97.217 port 52798 [preauth]
Oct 2 20:25:02 Server1 sshd[17050]: pam_unix(sshd:auth): authentication failure; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=152.136.97.217 user=r.r
........
-----------------------------------------------
https://www.blocklist.de/en/view.html?ip=152.136.97.217 |
2020-10-04 04:38:28 |
| 197.248.19.226 |
attackbotsspam |
Unauthorized connection attempt from IP address 197.248.19.226 on Port 445(SMB) |
2020-10-04 05:08:20 |
| 1.255.48.197 |
attackspambots |
(From annabelle@merchantpay.top) I have a quick question about working with your business. Like most business owners you just want to survive through to 2021. In order for that to happen you need to save every dollar possible right? This is an honest question, would you continue with the high credit card processing fees if there was another way? New laws are on your side. Test this newly released card processing model this October - just send a phone number and we'll call.
$24.99/mo Flat Fee Credit Card Processing (Unlimited)
1) As a small business owner accepting credit/debit, recently passed State Laws are on your side. - Were you aware?
New state regulations now in effect, the law was successfully passed in 46 states - effective since August 2019.
Since that date you shouldn't be paying above 0.75% Credit Card Processing Fees.
2) You're legally able to demand this new option.
Bottom Line: Your processor isn't telling you everything. Why are they hiding the lower fee options?
We repre |
2020-10-04 04:44:26 |