City: Aachen
Region: North Rhine-Westphalia
Country: Germany
Internet Service Provider: unknown
Hostname: unknown
Organization: unknown
Usage Type: unknown
b; <<>> DiG 9.10.3-P4-Ubuntu <<>> 137.226.134.147
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NXDOMAIN, id: 98
;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 1, ADDITIONAL: 0
;; QUESTION SECTION:
;137.226.134.147. IN A
;; AUTHORITY SECTION:
. 282 IN SOA a.root-servers.net. nstld.verisign-grs.com. 2022062402 1800 900 604800 86400
;; Query time: 21 msec
;; SERVER: 183.60.83.19#53(183.60.83.19)
;; WHEN: Sat Jun 25 09:25:08 CST 2022
;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 108147.134.226.137.in-addr.arpa domain name pointer digitextilspinnturm.ita-forschung.rwth-aachen.de.Server: 183.60.83.19
Address: 183.60.83.19#53
Non-authoritative answer:
147.134.226.137.in-addr.arpa name = digitextilspinnturm.ita-forschung.rwth-aachen.de.
Authoritative answers can be found from:| IP | Type | Details | Datetime |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1.255.48.197 | attack | (From annabelle@merchantpay.top) I have a quick question about working with your business. Like most business owners you just want to survive through to 2021. In order for that to happen you need to save every dollar possible right? This is an honest question, would you continue with the high credit card processing fees if there was another way? New laws are on your side. Test this newly released card processing model this October - just send a phone number and we'll call. $24.99/mo Flat Fee Credit Card Processing (Unlimited) 1) As a small business owner accepting credit/debit, recently passed State Laws are on your side. - Were you aware? New state regulations now in effect, the law was successfully passed in 46 states - effective since August 2019. Since that date you shouldn't be paying above 0.75% Credit Card Processing Fees. 2) You're legally able to demand this new option. Bottom Line: Your processor isn't telling you everything. Why are they hiding the lower fee options? We repre |
2020-10-03 20:52:07 |
| 5.189.130.92 | attack | TCP port : 5038 |
2020-10-03 21:59:28 |
| 114.129.168.188 | attackspam | [MK-VM5] Blocked by UFW |
2020-10-03 21:11:24 |
| 119.250.155.73 | attackbotsspam | SSH/22 MH Probe, BF, Hack - |
2020-10-03 21:14:31 |
| 138.197.175.236 | attack | [N1.H1.VM1] Port Scanner Detected Blocked by UFW |
2020-10-03 22:06:06 |
| 60.222.254.231 | attackbotsspam | 2020-10-03 08:25:18.247777-0500 localhost screensharingd[53694]: Authentication: FAILED :: User Name: N/A :: Viewer Address: 60.222.254.231 :: Type: VNC DES |
2020-10-03 22:06:24 |
| 170.0.160.165 | attackspam | Oct 2 16:27:05 cumulus sshd[22622]: Did not receive identification string from 170.0.160.165 port 56894 Oct 2 16:27:05 cumulus sshd[22624]: Did not receive identification string from 170.0.160.165 port 56901 Oct 2 16:27:05 cumulus sshd[22623]: Did not receive identification string from 170.0.160.165 port 56900 Oct 2 16:27:06 cumulus sshd[22625]: Did not receive identification string from 170.0.160.165 port 57113 Oct 2 16:27:06 cumulus sshd[22626]: Did not receive identification string from 170.0.160.165 port 57110 Oct 2 16:27:06 cumulus sshd[22627]: Did not receive identification string from 170.0.160.165 port 57122 Oct 2 16:27:06 cumulus sshd[22628]: Did not receive identification string from 170.0.160.165 port 57151 Oct 2 16:27:08 cumulus sshd[22631]: Invalid user guest from 170.0.160.165 port 57170 Oct 2 16:27:08 cumulus sshd[22634]: Invalid user guest from 170.0.160.165 port 57173 Oct 2 16:27:08 cumulus sshd[22632]: Invalid user guest from 170.0.160.165 po........ ------------------------------- |
2020-10-03 20:51:29 |
| 154.209.253.241 | attackbotsspam | Oct 3 14:49:55 serwer sshd\[25452\]: Invalid user ravi from 154.209.253.241 port 40898 Oct 3 14:49:55 serwer sshd\[25452\]: pam_unix\(sshd:auth\): authentication failure\; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=154.209.253.241 Oct 3 14:49:57 serwer sshd\[25452\]: Failed password for invalid user ravi from 154.209.253.241 port 40898 ssh2 ... |
2020-10-03 21:05:22 |
| 60.174.248.244 | attackspam |
|
2020-10-03 21:01:31 |
| 121.15.137.137 | attackspambots |
|
2020-10-03 22:02:13 |
| 45.125.222.120 | attack | Invalid user ftptest from 45.125.222.120 port 41354 |
2020-10-03 22:06:40 |
| 103.57.220.28 | attackspambots | Automatic report - Banned IP Access |
2020-10-03 20:59:32 |
| 46.101.7.67 | attackbotsspam | 2020-10-02T22:45:43.647446amanda2.illicoweb.com sshd\[31057\]: Invalid user eduardo from 46.101.7.67 port 55512 2020-10-02T22:45:43.652871amanda2.illicoweb.com sshd\[31057\]: pam_unix\(sshd:auth\): authentication failure\; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=46.101.7.67 2020-10-02T22:45:45.384843amanda2.illicoweb.com sshd\[31057\]: Failed password for invalid user eduardo from 46.101.7.67 port 55512 ssh2 2020-10-02T22:50:11.984213amanda2.illicoweb.com sshd\[31426\]: Invalid user fernando from 46.101.7.67 port 39966 2020-10-02T22:50:11.989521amanda2.illicoweb.com sshd\[31426\]: pam_unix\(sshd:auth\): authentication failure\; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=46.101.7.67 ... |
2020-10-03 21:07:24 |
| 49.233.3.177 | attack | Oct 3 10:05:39 localhost sshd\[18224\]: pam_unix\(sshd:auth\): authentication failure\; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=49.233.3.177 user=root Oct 3 10:05:41 localhost sshd\[18224\]: Failed password for root from 49.233.3.177 port 40984 ssh2 Oct 3 10:24:55 localhost sshd\[18370\]: Invalid user camille from 49.233.3.177 port 60894 ... |
2020-10-03 22:02:57 |
| 60.15.67.178 | attackspambots | Invalid user admin from 60.15.67.178 port 28893 |
2020-10-03 21:54:58 |