City: unknown
Region: unknown
Country: Viet Nam
Internet Service Provider: Vietnam Posts and Telecommunications Group
Hostname: unknown
Organization: unknown
Usage Type: unknown
| Type | Details | Datetime |
|---|---|---|
| attackspambots | Unauthorized connection attempt from IP address 14.160.29.66 on Port 445(SMB) |
2020-04-28 18:49:03 |
| attack | 20/2/2@23:46:03: FAIL: Alarm-Network address from=14.160.29.66 ... |
2020-02-03 20:25:25 |
| IP | Type | Details | Datetime |
|---|---|---|---|
| 14.160.29.42 | attackbots | failed_logins |
2020-08-02 18:01:41 |
| 14.160.29.42 | attackbots | Dovecot Invalid User Login Attempt. |
2020-07-07 16:18:07 |
| 14.160.29.42 | attackspam | Dovecot Invalid User Login Attempt. |
2020-06-27 20:21:43 |
| 14.160.29.42 | attack | 2020-05-0205:52:171jUjCK-0000M7-Fy\<=info@whatsup2013.chH=\(localhost\)[113.172.100.201]:34802P=esmtpsaX=TLS1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256CV=noA=dovecot_login:info@whatsup2013.chS=3059id=0e744e494269bc4f6c9264373ce8d1fdde343886ab@whatsup2013.chT="You'veeverbeenintruelove\?"forbglisson@rrisd.netquee1022@gmail.com2020-05-0205:52:361jUjCd-0000PA-5K\<=info@whatsup2013.chH=\(localhost\)[14.226.241.13]:51318P=esmtpsaX=TLS1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256CV=noA=dovecot_login:info@whatsup2013.chS=3126id=a5de31626942979bbcf94f1ce82f25291a466e29@whatsup2013.chT="Iamjustinlovewithyou"forusuiautumn@gmail.comahmed359901@gmail.com2020-05-0205:53:041jUjD5-0000RE-CP\<=info@whatsup2013.chH=\(localhost\)[14.187.121.142]:44772P=esmtpsaX=TLS1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256CV=noA=dovecot_login:info@whatsup2013.chS=3163id=888c3a696249636bf7f244e80ffbd1cd5f01fe@whatsup2013.chT="Youarefrommyfantasy"forrcolonna.mafp@gmail.combelcourt87@hotmail.com2020-05-0205:52:541jUjCv-0000Qh-0A\<=info@whatsup2013.chH=\(localhost\) |
2020-05-02 16:07:11 |
| 14.160.29.22 | attack | 445/tcp [2020-03-18]1pkt |
2020-03-18 20:59:36 |
| 14.160.29.58 | attackbots | Unauthorized connection attempt from IP address 14.160.29.58 on Port 445(SMB) |
2020-03-11 03:38:42 |
| 14.160.29.246 | attackbots | $f2bV_matches |
2020-03-01 17:50:27 |
b; <<>> DiG 9.10.3-P4-Ubuntu <<>> 14.160.29.66
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NXDOMAIN, id: 35699
;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 1, ADDITIONAL: 1
;; OPT PSEUDOSECTION:
; EDNS: version: 0, flags:; udp: 4096
;; QUESTION SECTION:
;14.160.29.66. IN A
;; AUTHORITY SECTION:
. 518 IN SOA a.root-servers.net. nstld.verisign-grs.com. 2020020300 1800 900 604800 86400
;; Query time: 54 msec
;; SERVER: 183.60.83.19#53(183.60.83.19)
;; WHEN: Mon Feb 03 20:25:21 CST 2020
;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 11666.29.160.14.in-addr.arpa domain name pointer static.vnpt.vn.Server: 183.60.83.19
Address: 183.60.83.19#53
Non-authoritative answer:
66.29.160.14.in-addr.arpa name = static.vnpt.vn.
Authoritative answers can be found from:| IP | Type | Details | Datetime |
|---|---|---|---|
| 147.139.132.146 | attack | Dec 29 13:52:50 server sshd\[9298\]: Invalid user menashi from 147.139.132.146 Dec 29 13:52:50 server sshd\[9298\]: pam_unix\(sshd:auth\): authentication failure\; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=147.139.132.146 Dec 29 13:52:53 server sshd\[9298\]: Failed password for invalid user menashi from 147.139.132.146 port 33044 ssh2 Dec 29 14:05:18 server sshd\[12226\]: Invalid user ach from 147.139.132.146 Dec 29 14:05:18 server sshd\[12226\]: pam_unix\(sshd:auth\): authentication failure\; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=147.139.132.146 ... |
2019-12-29 22:41:10 |
| 175.5.22.189 | attack | Scanning |
2019-12-29 22:49:11 |
| 172.81.248.249 | attack | Dec 29 15:38:12 [host] sshd[27202]: pam_unix(sshd:auth): authentication failure; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=172.81.248.249 user=root Dec 29 15:38:14 [host] sshd[27202]: Failed password for root from 172.81.248.249 port 56232 ssh2 Dec 29 15:39:42 [host] sshd[27456]: Invalid user webmaster from 172.81.248.249 |
2019-12-29 22:40:12 |
| 185.131.12.170 | attack | Attempts against SMTP/SSMTP |
2019-12-29 22:27:37 |
| 79.3.6.207 | attack | Automatic report - SSH Brute-Force Attack |
2019-12-29 22:10:22 |
| 78.188.21.128 | attack | Unauthorized connection attempt detected from IP address 78.188.21.128 to port 23 |
2019-12-29 22:41:33 |
| 5.122.4.96 | attack | [portscan] Port scan |
2019-12-29 22:11:24 |
| 103.254.120.222 | attackbots | Dec 29 09:30:55 mail sshd\[37497\]: Invalid user wwwrun from 103.254.120.222 Dec 29 09:30:55 mail sshd\[37497\]: pam_unix\(sshd:auth\): authentication failure\; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=103.254.120.222 ... |
2019-12-29 22:36:49 |
| 101.69.107.11 | attackspam | Scanning |
2019-12-29 22:13:36 |
| 103.118.49.11 | attackbots | port scan and connect, tcp 1433 (ms-sql-s) |
2019-12-29 22:47:20 |
| 144.217.243.216 | attack | Dec 29 09:19:28 Invalid user mysql from 144.217.243.216 port 43492 |
2019-12-29 22:18:09 |
| 201.161.58.107 | attackspam | 5x Failed Password |
2019-12-29 22:50:53 |
| 147.135.168.173 | attackbotsspam | $f2bV_matches |
2019-12-29 22:30:20 |
| 61.19.27.253 | attack | Dec 29 13:47:51 sxvn sshd[1981902]: pam_unix(sshd:auth): authentication failure; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=61.19.27.253 |
2019-12-29 22:35:59 |
| 107.173.209.21 | attackbotsspam | (From eric@talkwithcustomer.com) Hey, You have a website livewithvitality.com, right? Of course you do. I am looking at your website now. It gets traffic every day – that you’re probably spending $2 / $4 / $10 or more a click to get. Not including all of the work you put into creating social media, videos, blog posts, emails, and so on. So you’re investing seriously in getting people to that site. But how’s it working? Great? Okay? Not so much? If that answer could be better, then it’s likely you’re putting a lot of time, effort, and money into an approach that’s not paying off like it should. Now… imagine doubling your lead conversion in just minutes… In fact, I’ll go even better. You could actually get up to 100X more conversions! I’m not making this up. As Chris Smith, best-selling author of The Conversion Code says: Speed is essential - there is a 100x decrease in Leads when a Lead is contacted within 14 minutes vs being contacted within 5 minutes. He’s backed up by a |
2019-12-29 22:44:33 |