City: unknown
Region: unknown
Country: Pakistan
Internet Service Provider: unknown
Hostname: unknown
Organization: unknown
Usage Type: unknown
b; <<>> DiG 9.10.3-P4-Ubuntu <<>> 14.192.141.91
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NXDOMAIN, id: 1487
;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 1, ADDITIONAL: 0
;; QUESTION SECTION:
;14.192.141.91. IN A
;; AUTHORITY SECTION:
. 600 IN SOA a.root-servers.net. nstld.verisign-grs.com. 2022021300 1800 900 604800 86400
;; Query time: 55 msec
;; SERVER: 183.60.83.19#53(183.60.83.19)
;; WHEN: Sun Feb 13 14:39:35 CST 2022
;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 10691.141.192.14.in-addr.arpa domain name pointer fn141-static91.fariya.com.Server: 183.60.83.19
Address: 183.60.83.19#53
Non-authoritative answer:
91.141.192.14.in-addr.arpa name = fn141-static91.fariya.com.
Authoritative answers can be found from:| IP | Type | Details | Datetime |
|---|---|---|---|
| 192.241.239.179 | attackbots | MultiHost/MultiPort Probe, Scan, Hack - |
2020-10-03 19:43:12 |
| 180.168.47.238 | attackbotsspam | 2020-10-03T13:36:24.638594mail.broermann.family sshd[16268]: Invalid user debian from 180.168.47.238 port 42904 2020-10-03T13:36:24.642820mail.broermann.family sshd[16268]: pam_unix(sshd:auth): authentication failure; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=180.168.47.238 2020-10-03T13:36:24.638594mail.broermann.family sshd[16268]: Invalid user debian from 180.168.47.238 port 42904 2020-10-03T13:36:26.563514mail.broermann.family sshd[16268]: Failed password for invalid user debian from 180.168.47.238 port 42904 ssh2 2020-10-03T13:41:59.102109mail.broermann.family sshd[16779]: Invalid user bot from 180.168.47.238 port 41801 ... |
2020-10-03 19:46:57 |
| 190.3.118.163 | attack | Port scan on 1 port(s): 445 |
2020-10-03 19:34:59 |
| 94.102.56.238 | attackbots | 2020-10-03 13:06:53 dovecot_login authenticator failed for \(User\) \[94.102.56.238\]: 535 Incorrect authentication data \(set_id=info@no-server.de\) 2020-10-03 13:06:59 dovecot_login authenticator failed for \(User\) \[94.102.56.238\]: 535 Incorrect authentication data \(set_id=info@no-server.de\) 2020-10-03 13:07:09 dovecot_login authenticator failed for \(User\) \[94.102.56.238\]: 535 Incorrect authentication data \(set_id=info@no-server.de\) 2020-10-03 13:07:26 dovecot_login authenticator failed for \(User\) \[94.102.56.238\]: 535 Incorrect authentication data \(set_id=info@no-server.de\) 2020-10-03 13:07:43 dovecot_login authenticator failed for \(User\) \[94.102.56.238\]: 535 Incorrect authentication data \(set_id=info@no-server.de\) 2020-10-03 13:08:00 dovecot_login authenticator failed for \(User\) \[94.102.56.238\]: 535 Incorrect authentication data \(set_id=info@no-server.de\) 2020-10-03 13:08:00 SMTP call from \(User\) \[94.102.56.238\] dropped: too many nonmail commands \(l ... |
2020-10-03 20:01:35 |
| 157.230.89.133 | attackbots | Scanned 1 times in the last 24 hours on port 22 |
2020-10-03 19:59:48 |
| 208.109.13.144 | attackbots | Invalid user yt from 208.109.13.144 port 39024 |
2020-10-03 20:08:47 |
| 207.244.252.113 | attackspambots | (From annabelle@merchantpay.top) I have a quick question about working with your business. Like most business owners you just want to survive through to 2021. In order for that to happen you need to save every dollar possible right? This is an honest question, would you continue with the high credit card processing fees if there was another way? New laws are on your side. Test this newly released card processing model this October - just send a phone number and we'll call. $24.99/mo Flat Fee Credit Card Processing (Unlimited) 1) As a small business owner accepting credit/debit, recently passed State Laws are on your side. - Were you aware? New state regulations now in effect, the law was successfully passed in 46 states - effective since August 2019. Since that date you shouldn't be paying above 0.75% Credit Card Processing Fees. 2) You're legally able to demand this new option. Bottom Line: Your processor isn't telling you everything. Why are they hiding the lower fee options? We repre |
2020-10-03 20:02:21 |
| 211.253.26.117 | attackspam | Oct 3 12:40:48 vps sshd[15931]: pam_unix(sshd:auth): authentication failure; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=211.253.26.117 Oct 3 12:40:51 vps sshd[15931]: Failed password for invalid user Duck from 211.253.26.117 port 33548 ssh2 Oct 3 12:49:50 vps sshd[16349]: pam_unix(sshd:auth): authentication failure; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=211.253.26.117 ... |
2020-10-03 19:41:22 |
| 63.80.187.59 | attackbots | E-Mail Spam (RBL) [REJECTED] |
2020-10-03 19:37:35 |
| 138.68.148.177 | attackbotsspam | Invalid user web from 138.68.148.177 port 50132 |
2020-10-03 20:06:41 |
| 51.89.148.69 | attackbotsspam | Invalid user guest1 from 51.89.148.69 port 57754 |
2020-10-03 19:41:03 |
| 206.81.12.141 | attackbots | 1601722006 - 10/03/2020 12:46:46 Host: 206.81.12.141/206.81.12.141 Port: 99 TCP Blocked ... |
2020-10-03 19:46:05 |
| 92.184.112.140 | attackspambots | Unauthorized IMAP connection attempt |
2020-10-03 19:31:06 |
| 94.2.61.17 | attack | 2020-10-03T13:12:19.171881ks3355764 sshd[22460]: Invalid user server from 94.2.61.17 port 33282 2020-10-03T13:12:21.067140ks3355764 sshd[22460]: Failed password for invalid user server from 94.2.61.17 port 33282 ssh2 ... |
2020-10-03 19:42:29 |
| 189.162.61.193 | attackbotsspam | 1601670825 - 10/02/2020 22:33:45 Host: 189.162.61.193/189.162.61.193 Port: 445 TCP Blocked ... |
2020-10-03 19:49:32 |