Must be a valid IPv4 or IPv6 ip address, e.g. 127.0.0.1 or 2001:DB8:0:0:8:800:200C:417A
Basic Info

City: unknown

Region: unknown

Country: Indonesia

Internet Service Provider: unknown

Hostname: unknown

Organization: unknown

Usage Type: unknown

Comments:
No discussion about this IP yet. Click above link to make one.
Comments on same subnet:
No discussion about this subnet yet..
Whois info:
b
Dig info:
; <<>> DiG 9.10.3-P4-Ubuntu <<>> 140.213.239.140
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NXDOMAIN, id: 51351
;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 1, ADDITIONAL: 0

;; QUESTION SECTION:
;140.213.239.140.		IN	A

;; AUTHORITY SECTION:
.			29	IN	SOA	a.root-servers.net. nstld.verisign-grs.com. 2025020201 1800 900 604800 86400

;; Query time: 39 msec
;; SERVER: 183.60.83.19#53(183.60.83.19)
;; WHEN: Mon Feb 03 13:07:27 CST 2025
;; MSG SIZE  rcvd: 108
Host info
Host 140.239.213.140.in-addr.arpa. not found: 3(NXDOMAIN)
Nslookup info:
Server:		183.60.83.19
Address:	183.60.83.19#53

** server can't find 140.239.213.140.in-addr.arpa: NXDOMAIN
Related IP info:
Related comments:
IP Type Details Datetime
152.136.97.217 attackspam
Oct  2 20:24:59 Server1 sshd[17048]: Invalid user wellington from 152.136.97.217 port 52798
Oct  2 20:24:59 Server1 sshd[17048]: pam_unix(sshd:auth): authentication failure; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=152.136.97.217
Oct  2 20:25:01 Server1 sshd[17048]: Failed password for invalid user wellington from 152.136.97.217 port 52798 ssh2
Oct  2 20:25:01 Server1 sshd[17048]: Connection closed by invalid user wellington 152.136.97.217 port 52798 [preauth]
Oct  2 20:25:02 Server1 sshd[17050]: pam_unix(sshd:auth): authentication failure; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=152.136.97.217  user=r.r


........
-----------------------------------------------
https://www.blocklist.de/en/view.html?ip=152.136.97.217
2020-10-03 12:10:48
35.204.93.160 attackspam
RU spamvertising/fraud - From: Your Nail Fungus 

- UBE 188.240.221.164 (EHLO digitaldreamss.org) Virtono Networks Srl - BLACKLISTED
- Spam link digitaldreamss.org = 188.240.221.161 Virtono Networks Srl – BLACKLISTED
- Spam link redfloppy.com = 185.246.116.174 Vpsville LLC – repetitive phishing redirect:
a) aptrk15.com = 35.204.93.160 Google
b) trck.fun = 104.18.35.68, 104.18.34.68, 172.67.208.63 Cloudflare
c) muw.agileconnection.company = 107.179.2.229 Global Frag Networks (common with multiple spam series)
d) effective URL: www.google.com

Images - 185.246.116.174 Vpsville LLC
- http://redfloppy.com/web/imgs/j2cp9tu3.png = link to health fraud video
- http://redfloppy.com/web/imgs/ugqwjele.png = unsubscribe; no entity/address
2020-10-03 12:27:05
199.187.211.101 attackbotsspam
4,12-01/02 [bc00/m26] PostRequest-Spammer scoring: paris
2020-10-03 12:03:31
46.101.7.67 attackbotsspam
2020-10-02T22:45:43.647446amanda2.illicoweb.com sshd\[31057\]: Invalid user eduardo from 46.101.7.67 port 55512
2020-10-02T22:45:43.652871amanda2.illicoweb.com sshd\[31057\]: pam_unix\(sshd:auth\): authentication failure\; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=46.101.7.67
2020-10-02T22:45:45.384843amanda2.illicoweb.com sshd\[31057\]: Failed password for invalid user eduardo from 46.101.7.67 port 55512 ssh2
2020-10-02T22:50:11.984213amanda2.illicoweb.com sshd\[31426\]: Invalid user fernando from 46.101.7.67 port 39966
2020-10-02T22:50:11.989521amanda2.illicoweb.com sshd\[31426\]: pam_unix\(sshd:auth\): authentication failure\; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=46.101.7.67
...
2020-10-03 07:14:09
183.166.170.133 attackspam
Oct  2 22:30:45 srv01 postfix/smtpd\[1755\]: warning: unknown\[183.166.170.133\]: SASL LOGIN authentication failed: UGFzc3dvcmQ6
Oct  2 22:34:11 srv01 postfix/smtpd\[6490\]: warning: unknown\[183.166.170.133\]: SASL LOGIN authentication failed: UGFzc3dvcmQ6
Oct  2 22:37:37 srv01 postfix/smtpd\[11183\]: warning: unknown\[183.166.170.133\]: SASL LOGIN authentication failed: UGFzc3dvcmQ6
Oct  2 22:41:03 srv01 postfix/smtpd\[11183\]: warning: unknown\[183.166.170.133\]: SASL LOGIN authentication failed: UGFzc3dvcmQ6
Oct  2 22:41:14 srv01 postfix/smtpd\[11183\]: warning: unknown\[183.166.170.133\]: SASL LOGIN authentication failed: UGFzc3dvcmQ6
...
2020-10-03 12:28:54
5.200.241.104 attack
1601671289 - 10/02/2020 22:41:29 Host: 5.200.241.104/5.200.241.104 Port: 445 TCP Blocked
2020-10-03 12:23:02
72.180.73.137 attack
Oct  2 20:39:03 staging sshd[181430]: Invalid user cliente from 72.180.73.137 port 41824
Oct  2 20:39:05 staging sshd[181430]: Failed password for invalid user cliente from 72.180.73.137 port 41824 ssh2
Oct  2 20:41:11 staging sshd[181435]: pam_unix(sshd:auth): authentication failure; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=72.180.73.137  user=root
Oct  2 20:41:12 staging sshd[181435]: Failed password for root from 72.180.73.137 port 49692 ssh2
...
2020-10-03 07:17:22
139.155.91.141 attackbots
20 attempts against mh-ssh on star
2020-10-03 12:04:34
103.246.240.30 attackspam
Oct  3 05:55:12 h2829583 sshd[8497]: pam_unix(sshd:auth): authentication failure; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=103.246.240.30
2020-10-03 12:12:14
222.186.42.213 attack
$f2bV_matches
2020-10-03 12:11:20
34.96.218.228 attackspambots
Invalid user git from 34.96.218.228 port 48716
2020-10-03 07:10:01
1.255.48.197 attack
(From annabelle@merchantpay.top) I have a quick question about working with your business. Like most business owners you just want to survive through to 2021. In order for that to happen you need to save every dollar possible right? This is an honest question, would you continue with the high credit card processing fees if there was another way?  New laws are on your side. Test this newly released card processing model this October -  just send a phone number and we'll call.

$24.99/mo Flat Fee Credit Card Processing (Unlimited)

1) As a small business owner accepting credit/debit, recently passed State Laws are on your side. - Were you aware? 
New state regulations now in effect, the law was successfully passed in 46 states - effective since August 2019. 

Since that date you shouldn't be paying above 0.75% Credit Card Processing Fees. 
2) You're legally able to demand this new option. 

Bottom Line: Your processor isn't telling you everything. Why are they hiding the lower fee options?

We repre
2020-10-03 12:17:46
60.174.248.244 attackspambots
Fail2Ban Ban Triggered
2020-10-03 12:26:41
114.129.168.188 attackspambots
[MK-VM5] Blocked by UFW
2020-10-03 07:18:21
46.101.8.109 attackspambots
21 attempts against mh-ssh on fire
2020-10-03 07:12:20

Recently Reported IPs

18.79.21.39 195.54.167.37 222.249.73.158 242.39.201.11
231.141.149.2 187.106.249.66 220.188.153.47 37.139.11.51
37.98.86.119 78.40.40.205 145.54.32.173 125.84.156.214
92.241.238.120 142.56.173.169 20.84.179.252 214.155.154.216
53.11.73.174 141.33.39.161 228.35.12.149 190.130.108.65