| 188.131.137.114 |
attackspambots |
Oct 3 12:19:34 h2829583 sshd[11900]: pam_unix(sshd:auth): authentication failure; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=188.131.137.114 |
2020-10-03 21:15:45 |
| 41.207.7.240 |
attack |
Lines containing failures of 41.207.7.240
Oct 2 22:24:45 new sshd[31337]: Did not receive identification string from 41.207.7.240 port 57604
Oct 2 22:24:45 new sshd[31338]: Did not receive identification string from 41.207.7.240 port 57607
Oct 2 22:24:48 new sshd[31341]: Did not receive identification string from 41.207.7.240 port 57651
Oct 2 22:24:48 new sshd[31339]: Invalid user dircreate from 41.207.7.240 port 57884
Oct 2 22:24:48 new sshd[31339]: pam_unix(sshd:auth): authentication failure; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=41.207.7.240
Oct 2 22:24:50 new sshd[31339]: Failed password for invalid user dircreate from 41.207.7.240 port 57884 ssh2
Oct 2 22:24:50 new sshd[31343]: Invalid user dircreate from 41.207.7.240 port 57893
Oct 2 22:24:50 new sshd[31343]: pam_unix(sshd:auth): authentication failure; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=41.207.7.240
Oct 2 22:24:50 new sshd[31339]: Connection closed by invalid user dircreate 41.207.7.240 port ........
------------------------------ |
2020-10-03 20:41:29 |
| 34.96.218.228 |
attackspambots |
2020-10-03T16:52:50.212501paragon sshd[612934]: Invalid user factorio from 34.96.218.228 port 40796
2020-10-03T16:52:50.216747paragon sshd[612934]: pam_unix(sshd:auth): authentication failure; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=34.96.218.228
2020-10-03T16:52:50.212501paragon sshd[612934]: Invalid user factorio from 34.96.218.228 port 40796
2020-10-03T16:52:52.384280paragon sshd[612934]: Failed password for invalid user factorio from 34.96.218.228 port 40796 ssh2
2020-10-03T16:56:42.428013paragon sshd[613045]: Invalid user sonos from 34.96.218.228 port 48582
... |
2020-10-03 21:03:27 |
| 45.148.121.92 |
attackspam |
UDP port : 5060 |
2020-10-03 20:46:55 |
| 188.166.178.42 |
attackspambots |
20 attempts against mh-ssh on air |
2020-10-03 21:15:22 |
| 80.20.14.250 |
attackspambots |
Oct 3 14:49:24 roki-contabo sshd\[9041\]: Invalid user antoine from 80.20.14.250
Oct 3 14:49:24 roki-contabo sshd\[9041\]: pam_unix\(sshd:auth\): authentication failure\; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=80.20.14.250
Oct 3 14:49:26 roki-contabo sshd\[9041\]: Failed password for invalid user antoine from 80.20.14.250 port 37834 ssh2
Oct 3 15:02:57 roki-contabo sshd\[9284\]: pam_unix\(sshd:auth\): authentication failure\; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=80.20.14.250 user=root
Oct 3 15:02:59 roki-contabo sshd\[9284\]: Failed password for root from 80.20.14.250 port 56000 ssh2
... |
2020-10-03 21:18:02 |
| 179.197.71.132 |
attack |
1601671289 - 10/02/2020 22:41:29 Host: 179.197.71.132/179.197.71.132 Port: 445 TCP Blocked |
2020-10-03 20:55:27 |
| 112.238.151.20 |
attackspambots |
REQUESTED PAGE: /GponForm/diag_Form?images/ |
2020-10-03 21:11:47 |
| 51.195.47.153 |
attackbotsspam |
Time: Sat Oct 3 14:50:49 2020 +0200
IP: 51.195.47.153 (FR/France/-0afdd373..ovh.net)
Failures: 5 (sshd)
Interval: 3600 seconds
Blocked: Permanent Block [LF_SSHD]
Log entries:
Oct 3 14:33:32 mail sshd[8711]: Invalid user test from 51.195.47.153 port 38858
Oct 3 14:33:34 mail sshd[8711]: Failed password for invalid user test from 51.195.47.153 port 38858 ssh2
Oct 3 14:47:14 mail sshd[9416]: Invalid user oracle from 51.195.47.153 port 37452
Oct 3 14:47:17 mail sshd[9416]: Failed password for invalid user oracle from 51.195.47.153 port 37452 ssh2
Oct 3 14:50:44 mail sshd[9569]: Invalid user robert from 51.195.47.153 port 44684 |
2020-10-03 20:54:46 |
| 157.230.245.91 |
attackspam |
Invalid user switch from 157.230.245.91 port 43234 |
2020-10-03 21:02:36 |
| 128.199.134.165 |
attackbotsspam |
21700/tcp 3914/tcp 19434/tcp...
[2020-08-02/10-02]210pkt,71pt.(tcp) |
2020-10-03 21:58:27 |
| 183.111.148.118 |
attackbotsspam |
Port scan: Attack repeated for 24 hours |
2020-10-03 22:00:22 |
| 209.159.155.70 |
attackbotsspam |
2020-10-03T13:57:23+0200 Failed SSH Authentication/Brute Force Attack.(Server 2) |
2020-10-03 20:49:46 |
| 1.255.48.197 |
attack |
(From annabelle@merchantpay.top) I have a quick question about working with your business. Like most business owners you just want to survive through to 2021. In order for that to happen you need to save every dollar possible right? This is an honest question, would you continue with the high credit card processing fees if there was another way? New laws are on your side. Test this newly released card processing model this October - just send a phone number and we'll call.
$24.99/mo Flat Fee Credit Card Processing (Unlimited)
1) As a small business owner accepting credit/debit, recently passed State Laws are on your side. - Were you aware?
New state regulations now in effect, the law was successfully passed in 46 states - effective since August 2019.
Since that date you shouldn't be paying above 0.75% Credit Card Processing Fees.
2) You're legally able to demand this new option.
Bottom Line: Your processor isn't telling you everything. Why are they hiding the lower fee options?
We repre |
2020-10-03 20:52:07 |
| 34.120.202.146 |
attack |
RU spamvertising, health fraud - From: GlucaFIX
UBE 185.176.220.179 (EHLO gopxk.imkeeperr.com) 2 Cloud Ltd.
Spam link redfloppy.com = 185.246.116.174 Vpsville LLC – phishing redirect:
a) aptrk13.com = 35.204.93.160 Google
b) www.ep20trk.com = 34.120.202.146 Google
c) www.glucafix.us = 104.27.187.98, 104.27.186.98, 172.67.201.182 Cloudflare
d) glucafix.us = ditto
Images -
- http://redfloppy.com/web/imgs/mi1tb6fg.png = dailybetterhealth.com = 104.27.138.27, 104.27.139.27, 172.67.218.161 Cloudflare
- http://redfloppy.com/web/imgs/24sc48jt.png = unsub; no entity/address |
2020-10-03 20:40:17 |