City: unknown
Region: unknown
Country: Türkiye
Internet Service Provider: unknown
Hostname: unknown
Organization: unknown
Usage Type: unknown
b
; <<>> DiG 9.10.3-P4-Ubuntu <<>> 195.85.70.129
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NXDOMAIN, id: 44824
;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 1, ADDITIONAL: 0
;; QUESTION SECTION:
;195.85.70.129. IN A
;; AUTHORITY SECTION:
. 29 IN SOA a.root-servers.net. nstld.verisign-grs.com. 2025012800 1800 900 604800 86400
;; Query time: 13 msec
;; SERVER: 183.60.83.19#53(183.60.83.19)
;; WHEN: Tue Jan 28 20:37:48 CST 2025
;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 106
Host 129.70.85.195.in-addr.arpa. not found: 3(NXDOMAIN)
Server: 183.60.83.19
Address: 183.60.83.19#53
** server can't find 129.70.85.195.in-addr.arpa: NXDOMAIN
IP | Type | Details | Datetime |
---|---|---|---|
1.255.48.197 | attackspambots | (From annabelle@merchantpay.top) I have a quick question about working with your business. Like most business owners you just want to survive through to 2021. In order for that to happen you need to save every dollar possible right? This is an honest question, would you continue with the high credit card processing fees if there was another way? New laws are on your side. Test this newly released card processing model this October - just send a phone number and we'll call. $24.99/mo Flat Fee Credit Card Processing (Unlimited) 1) As a small business owner accepting credit/debit, recently passed State Laws are on your side. - Were you aware? New state regulations now in effect, the law was successfully passed in 46 states - effective since August 2019. Since that date you shouldn't be paying above 0.75% Credit Card Processing Fees. 2) You're legally able to demand this new option. Bottom Line: Your processor isn't telling you everything. Why are they hiding the lower fee options? We repre |
2020-10-04 04:44:26 |
51.254.37.192 | attack | (sshd) Failed SSH login from 51.254.37.192 (FR/France/-): 5 in the last 3600 secs; Ports: *; Direction: inout; Trigger: LF_SSHD; Logs: Oct 3 01:14:10 server5 sshd[9274]: Invalid user ofbiz from 51.254.37.192 Oct 3 01:14:12 server5 sshd[9274]: Failed password for invalid user ofbiz from 51.254.37.192 port 57676 ssh2 Oct 3 01:18:05 server5 sshd[11135]: Invalid user root01 from 51.254.37.192 Oct 3 01:18:07 server5 sshd[11135]: Failed password for invalid user root01 from 51.254.37.192 port 40362 ssh2 Oct 3 01:21:23 server5 sshd[12514]: Invalid user docker from 51.254.37.192 |
2020-10-04 04:30:15 |
190.36.156.72 | attackspam | Unauthorised access (Oct 2) SRC=190.36.156.72 LEN=52 TTL=116 ID=7606 DF TCP DPT=445 WINDOW=8192 SYN |
2020-10-04 04:55:45 |
34.120.202.146 | attack | RU spamvertising, health fraud - From: GlucaFIX |
2020-10-04 04:33:59 |
160.124.103.55 | attackbots | (sshd) Failed SSH login from 160.124.103.55 (HK/Hong Kong/-): 5 in the last 3600 secs |
2020-10-04 04:31:39 |
111.198.48.204 | attack | Oct 3 15:45:45 h2646465 sshd[26909]: Invalid user squid from 111.198.48.204 Oct 3 15:45:45 h2646465 sshd[26909]: pam_unix(sshd:auth): authentication failure; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=111.198.48.204 Oct 3 15:45:45 h2646465 sshd[26909]: Invalid user squid from 111.198.48.204 Oct 3 15:45:47 h2646465 sshd[26909]: Failed password for invalid user squid from 111.198.48.204 port 41156 ssh2 Oct 3 15:54:58 h2646465 sshd[27644]: Invalid user ftpuser from 111.198.48.204 Oct 3 15:54:58 h2646465 sshd[27644]: pam_unix(sshd:auth): authentication failure; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=111.198.48.204 Oct 3 15:54:58 h2646465 sshd[27644]: Invalid user ftpuser from 111.198.48.204 Oct 3 15:55:00 h2646465 sshd[27644]: Failed password for invalid user ftpuser from 111.198.48.204 port 39430 ssh2 Oct 3 15:59:30 h2646465 sshd[28274]: Invalid user lisa from 111.198.48.204 ... |
2020-10-04 04:30:55 |
146.185.215.204 | attackbots | Oct 2 22:29:59 tux postfix/smtpd[10847]: warning: hostname bilaterale1.perkjcep.example.com does not resolve to address 146.185.215.204: Name or service not known Oct 2 22:29:59 tux postfix/smtpd[10847]: connect from unknown[146.185.215.204] Oct x@x Oct 2 22:29:59 tux postfix/smtpd[10847]: disconnect from unknown[146.185.215.204] ........ ----------------------------------------------- https://www.blocklist.de/en/view.html?ip=146.185.215.204 |
2020-10-04 04:52:47 |
179.197.71.132 | attackspambots | 1601671289 - 10/02/2020 22:41:29 Host: 179.197.71.132/179.197.71.132 Port: 445 TCP Blocked |
2020-10-04 04:47:33 |
154.209.253.241 | attackspam | SSH bruteforce |
2020-10-04 04:56:37 |
193.169.252.37 | attackspambots | hzb4 193.169.252.37 [03/Oct/2020:23:59:58 "-" "POST /wp-login.php 200 4612 193.169.252.37 [03/Oct/2020:23:59:59 "-" "POST /wp-login.php 200 4612 193.169.252.37 [03/Oct/2020:23:59:59 "-" "POST /wp-login.php 200 4612 |
2020-10-04 04:33:05 |
140.143.207.57 | attack | Oct 3 22:20:48 cho sshd[4146872]: Failed password for invalid user lucas from 140.143.207.57 port 33944 ssh2 Oct 3 22:25:26 cho sshd[4147200]: Invalid user noc from 140.143.207.57 port 59114 Oct 3 22:25:26 cho sshd[4147200]: pam_unix(sshd:auth): authentication failure; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=140.143.207.57 Oct 3 22:25:26 cho sshd[4147200]: Invalid user noc from 140.143.207.57 port 59114 Oct 3 22:25:29 cho sshd[4147200]: Failed password for invalid user noc from 140.143.207.57 port 59114 ssh2 ... |
2020-10-04 04:57:12 |
103.57.220.28 | attackspambots | Attempt to hack Wordpress Login, XMLRPC or other login |
2020-10-04 04:51:00 |
114.67.254.244 | attack | Brute-force attempt banned |
2020-10-04 04:37:37 |
189.154.176.137 | attackspambots | 2020-10-03T03:22:39.728175hostname sshd[49215]: Failed password for invalid user portal from 189.154.176.137 port 48876 ssh2 ... |
2020-10-04 04:52:18 |
35.204.93.160 | attack | RU spamvertising/fraud - From: Your Nail Fungus |
2020-10-04 04:53:26 |