| 182.74.25.246 |
attackbots |
Oct 3 21:19:55 gospond sshd[30931]: Invalid user jake from 182.74.25.246 port 54965
... |
2020-10-04 04:26:57 |
| 83.239.38.2 |
attack |
Oct 2 16:17:17 *hidden* sshd[12275]: pam_unix(sshd:auth): authentication failure; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=83.239.38.2 Oct 2 16:17:20 *hidden* sshd[12275]: Failed password for invalid user admin from 83.239.38.2 port 58160 ssh2 Oct 2 16:26:41 *hidden* sshd[16513]: Invalid user tom from 83.239.38.2 port 33522 |
2020-10-04 04:46:39 |
| 81.69.177.253 |
attackspambots |
2020-10-03T03:41:53.307315hostname sshd[49502]: Failed password for invalid user nick from 81.69.177.253 port 37132 ssh2
... |
2020-10-04 04:35:39 |
| 190.156.238.155 |
attackspam |
SSH brute-force attack detected from [190.156.238.155] |
2020-10-04 04:29:10 |
| 183.166.170.133 |
attackbotsspam |
Oct 2 22:30:45 srv01 postfix/smtpd\[1755\]: warning: unknown\[183.166.170.133\]: SASL LOGIN authentication failed: UGFzc3dvcmQ6
Oct 2 22:34:11 srv01 postfix/smtpd\[6490\]: warning: unknown\[183.166.170.133\]: SASL LOGIN authentication failed: UGFzc3dvcmQ6
Oct 2 22:37:37 srv01 postfix/smtpd\[11183\]: warning: unknown\[183.166.170.133\]: SASL LOGIN authentication failed: UGFzc3dvcmQ6
Oct 2 22:41:03 srv01 postfix/smtpd\[11183\]: warning: unknown\[183.166.170.133\]: SASL LOGIN authentication failed: UGFzc3dvcmQ6
Oct 2 22:41:14 srv01 postfix/smtpd\[11183\]: warning: unknown\[183.166.170.133\]: SASL LOGIN authentication failed: UGFzc3dvcmQ6
... |
2020-10-04 04:56:08 |
| 46.101.8.109 |
attackbots |
SSH/22 MH Probe, BF, Hack - |
2020-10-04 04:56:49 |
| 220.186.173.217 |
attack |
Oct 3 17:29:34 vm1 sshd[30346]: pam_unix(sshd:auth): authentication failure; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=220.186.173.217
Oct 3 17:29:36 vm1 sshd[30346]: Failed password for invalid user laura from 220.186.173.217 port 45818 ssh2
... |
2020-10-04 04:22:11 |
| 189.154.176.137 |
attackspambots |
2020-10-03T03:22:39.728175hostname sshd[49215]: Failed password for invalid user portal from 189.154.176.137 port 48876 ssh2
... |
2020-10-04 04:52:18 |
| 34.120.202.146 |
attack |
RU spamvertising, health fraud - From: GlucaFIX
UBE 185.176.220.179 (EHLO gopxk.imkeeperr.com) 2 Cloud Ltd.
Spam link redfloppy.com = 185.246.116.174 Vpsville LLC – phishing redirect:
a) aptrk13.com = 35.204.93.160 Google
b) www.ep20trk.com = 34.120.202.146 Google
c) www.glucafix.us = 104.27.187.98, 104.27.186.98, 172.67.201.182 Cloudflare
d) glucafix.us = ditto
Images -
- http://redfloppy.com/web/imgs/mi1tb6fg.png = dailybetterhealth.com = 104.27.138.27, 104.27.139.27, 172.67.218.161 Cloudflare
- http://redfloppy.com/web/imgs/24sc48jt.png = unsub; no entity/address |
2020-10-04 04:33:59 |
| 217.21.54.221 |
attack |
Invalid user jiayuanyang from 217.21.54.221 port 46354 |
2020-10-04 04:25:06 |
| 180.76.118.175 |
attackbotsspam |
Connection to SSH Honeypot - Detected by HoneypotDB |
2020-10-04 04:21:46 |
| 139.155.91.141 |
attack |
Brute%20Force%20SSH |
2020-10-04 04:32:32 |
| 46.105.75.105 |
attackbots |
$f2bV_matches |
2020-10-04 04:50:32 |
| 185.202.1.99 |
attackbots |
Fail2Ban Ban Triggered |
2020-10-04 04:22:28 |
| 1.255.48.197 |
attackspambots |
(From annabelle@merchantpay.top) I have a quick question about working with your business. Like most business owners you just want to survive through to 2021. In order for that to happen you need to save every dollar possible right? This is an honest question, would you continue with the high credit card processing fees if there was another way? New laws are on your side. Test this newly released card processing model this October - just send a phone number and we'll call.
$24.99/mo Flat Fee Credit Card Processing (Unlimited)
1) As a small business owner accepting credit/debit, recently passed State Laws are on your side. - Were you aware?
New state regulations now in effect, the law was successfully passed in 46 states - effective since August 2019.
Since that date you shouldn't be paying above 0.75% Credit Card Processing Fees.
2) You're legally able to demand this new option.
Bottom Line: Your processor isn't telling you everything. Why are they hiding the lower fee options?
We repre |
2020-10-04 04:44:26 |