| 129.28.169.185 |
attackspambots |
Invalid user kang from 129.28.169.185 port 56482 |
2020-10-03 20:06:59 |
| 128.199.88.188 |
attackspam |
Invalid user user2 from 128.199.88.188 port 58799 |
2020-10-03 20:02:56 |
| 114.67.77.159 |
attack |
Invalid user deploy from 114.67.77.159 port 41294 |
2020-10-03 20:16:38 |
| 62.4.16.46 |
attackspambots |
Invalid user ralph from 62.4.16.46 port 46574 |
2020-10-03 20:26:31 |
| 177.73.2.57 |
attackspam |
Oct 3 03:59:54 pve1 sshd[26854]: pam_unix(sshd:auth): authentication failure; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=177.73.2.57
Oct 3 03:59:56 pve1 sshd[26854]: Failed password for invalid user usertest from 177.73.2.57 port 47562 ssh2
... |
2020-10-03 20:26:11 |
| 51.210.43.189 |
attack |
Invalid user alfredo from 51.210.43.189 port 48970 |
2020-10-03 20:21:17 |
| 34.120.202.146 |
attack |
RU spamvertising, health fraud - From: GlucaFIX
UBE 185.176.220.179 (EHLO gopxk.imkeeperr.com) 2 Cloud Ltd.
Spam link redfloppy.com = 185.246.116.174 Vpsville LLC – phishing redirect:
a) aptrk13.com = 35.204.93.160 Google
b) www.ep20trk.com = 34.120.202.146 Google
c) www.glucafix.us = 104.27.187.98, 104.27.186.98, 172.67.201.182 Cloudflare
d) glucafix.us = ditto
Images -
- http://redfloppy.com/web/imgs/mi1tb6fg.png = dailybetterhealth.com = 104.27.138.27, 104.27.139.27, 172.67.218.161 Cloudflare
- http://redfloppy.com/web/imgs/24sc48jt.png = unsub; no entity/address |
2020-10-03 20:40:17 |
| 207.244.252.113 |
attackspambots |
(From annabelle@merchantpay.top) I have a quick question about working with your business. Like most business owners you just want to survive through to 2021. In order for that to happen you need to save every dollar possible right? This is an honest question, would you continue with the high credit card processing fees if there was another way? New laws are on your side. Test this newly released card processing model this October - just send a phone number and we'll call.
$24.99/mo Flat Fee Credit Card Processing (Unlimited)
1) As a small business owner accepting credit/debit, recently passed State Laws are on your side. - Were you aware?
New state regulations now in effect, the law was successfully passed in 46 states - effective since August 2019.
Since that date you shouldn't be paying above 0.75% Credit Card Processing Fees.
2) You're legally able to demand this new option.
Bottom Line: Your processor isn't telling you everything. Why are they hiding the lower fee options?
We repre |
2020-10-03 20:02:21 |
| 114.4.227.194 |
attack |
2020-10-03T13:09:20.614817mail.standpoint.com.ua sshd[15978]: Invalid user yang from 114.4.227.194 port 57726
2020-10-03T13:09:20.617653mail.standpoint.com.ua sshd[15978]: pam_unix(sshd:auth): authentication failure; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=114.4.227.194
2020-10-03T13:09:20.614817mail.standpoint.com.ua sshd[15978]: Invalid user yang from 114.4.227.194 port 57726
2020-10-03T13:09:22.371814mail.standpoint.com.ua sshd[15978]: Failed password for invalid user yang from 114.4.227.194 port 57726 ssh2
2020-10-03T13:13:42.416069mail.standpoint.com.ua sshd[16585]: Invalid user tor from 114.4.227.194 port 36896
... |
2020-10-03 20:03:35 |
| 212.70.149.36 |
attackbotsspam |
Oct 3 13:57:48 s1 postfix/submission/smtpd\[6789\]: warning: unknown\[212.70.149.36\]: SASL LOGIN authentication failed: UGFzc3dvcmQ6
Oct 3 13:58:05 s1 postfix/submission/smtpd\[6789\]: warning: unknown\[212.70.149.36\]: SASL LOGIN authentication failed: UGFzc3dvcmQ6
Oct 3 13:58:24 s1 postfix/submission/smtpd\[6789\]: warning: unknown\[212.70.149.36\]: SASL LOGIN authentication failed: UGFzc3dvcmQ6
Oct 3 13:58:44 s1 postfix/submission/smtpd\[6789\]: warning: unknown\[212.70.149.36\]: SASL LOGIN authentication failed: UGFzc3dvcmQ6
Oct 3 13:59:10 s1 postfix/submission/smtpd\[6789\]: warning: unknown\[212.70.149.36\]: SASL LOGIN authentication failed: UGFzc3dvcmQ6
Oct 3 13:59:29 s1 postfix/submission/smtpd\[6789\]: warning: unknown\[212.70.149.36\]: SASL LOGIN authentication failed: UGFzc3dvcmQ6
Oct 3 13:59:49 s1 postfix/submission/smtpd\[6789\]: warning: unknown\[212.70.149.36\]: SASL LOGIN authentication failed: UGFzc3dvcmQ6
Oct 3 14:00:15 s1 postfix/submission/smtpd\[13467\]: warning: unknown\[212.70. |
2020-10-03 20:04:39 |
| 117.50.7.14 |
attack |
SSH login attempts. |
2020-10-03 20:07:49 |
| 185.26.28.232 |
attackbotsspam |
2020-10-03T09:13:47.501799abusebot.cloudsearch.cf sshd[24351]: Invalid user rodrigo from 185.26.28.232 port 42166
2020-10-03T09:13:47.509737abusebot.cloudsearch.cf sshd[24351]: pam_unix(sshd:auth): authentication failure; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=185.26.28.232
2020-10-03T09:13:47.501799abusebot.cloudsearch.cf sshd[24351]: Invalid user rodrigo from 185.26.28.232 port 42166
2020-10-03T09:13:49.702662abusebot.cloudsearch.cf sshd[24351]: Failed password for invalid user rodrigo from 185.26.28.232 port 42166 ssh2
2020-10-03T09:17:36.205816abusebot.cloudsearch.cf sshd[24430]: Invalid user deploy from 185.26.28.232 port 49822
2020-10-03T09:17:36.212391abusebot.cloudsearch.cf sshd[24430]: pam_unix(sshd:auth): authentication failure; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=185.26.28.232
2020-10-03T09:17:36.205816abusebot.cloudsearch.cf sshd[24430]: Invalid user deploy from 185.26.28.232 port 49822
2020-10-03T09:17:38.510372abusebot.cloudsearch.cf sshd[24430]: Failed passwor
... |
2020-10-03 20:18:12 |
| 42.200.148.195 |
attack |
TCP (SYN) 42.200.148.195:10932 -> port 23, len 44 |
2020-10-03 19:58:58 |
| 157.245.189.108 |
attack |
Oct 3 14:05:04 nopemail auth.info sshd[16159]: Invalid user bharat from 157.245.189.108 port 42094
... |
2020-10-03 20:15:18 |
| 218.104.225.140 |
attack |
Oct 3 13:41:48 server sshd[48698]: Failed password for invalid user torrent from 218.104.225.140 port 20099 ssh2
Oct 3 13:44:54 server sshd[49368]: Failed password for invalid user ventas from 218.104.225.140 port 1422 ssh2
Oct 3 13:46:40 server sshd[49765]: Failed password for invalid user al from 218.104.225.140 port 29937 ssh2 |
2020-10-03 19:59:28 |