| 137.103.161.110 |
spambotsattackproxynormal |
I seen as a device I don't own on my device |
2020-10-03 12:17:19 |
| 182.254.195.46 |
attackspam |
$f2bV_matches |
2020-10-03 12:18:13 |
| 199.187.211.101 |
attackbotsspam |
4,12-01/02 [bc00/m26] PostRequest-Spammer scoring: paris |
2020-10-03 12:03:31 |
| 167.172.36.232 |
attack |
Oct 2 21:28:00 email sshd\[633\]: Invalid user unifi from 167.172.36.232
Oct 2 21:28:00 email sshd\[633\]: pam_unix\(sshd:auth\): authentication failure\; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=167.172.36.232
Oct 2 21:28:01 email sshd\[633\]: Failed password for invalid user unifi from 167.172.36.232 port 46238 ssh2
Oct 2 21:31:17 email sshd\[1223\]: Invalid user walter from 167.172.36.232
Oct 2 21:31:17 email sshd\[1223\]: pam_unix\(sshd:auth\): authentication failure\; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=167.172.36.232
... |
2020-10-03 12:10:22 |
| 193.112.191.228 |
attackspambots |
SSH Invalid Login |
2020-10-03 07:14:35 |
| 112.238.151.20 |
attackbots |
REQUESTED PAGE: /GponForm/diag_Form?images/ |
2020-10-03 07:18:38 |
| 122.51.252.45 |
attack |
SSH Invalid Login |
2020-10-03 07:21:41 |
| 35.204.93.160 |
attack |
RU spamvertising/fraud - From: Your Nail Fungus
- UBE 188.240.221.164 (EHLO digitaldreamss.org) Virtono Networks Srl - BLACKLISTED
- Spam link digitaldreamss.org = 188.240.221.161 Virtono Networks Srl – BLACKLISTED
- Spam link redfloppy.com = 185.246.116.174 Vpsville LLC – repetitive phishing redirect:
a) aptrk15.com = 35.204.93.160 Google
b) trck.fun = 104.18.35.68, 104.18.34.68, 172.67.208.63 Cloudflare
c) muw.agileconnection.company = 107.179.2.229 Global Frag Networks (common with multiple spam series)
d) effective URL: www.google.com
Images - 185.246.116.174 Vpsville LLC
- http://redfloppy.com/web/imgs/j2cp9tu3.png = link to health fraud video
- http://redfloppy.com/web/imgs/ugqwjele.png = unsubscribe; no entity/address |
2020-10-03 07:08:17 |
| 140.143.207.57 |
attackbots |
SSH Invalid Login |
2020-10-03 07:12:42 |
| 175.137.104.57 |
attack |
Lines containing failures of 175.137.104.57 (max 1000)
Oct 2 22:27:37 srv sshd[98150]: Connection closed by 175.137.104.57 port 61298
Oct 2 22:27:40 srv sshd[98151]: Invalid user 666666 from 175.137.104.57 port 61479
Oct 2 22:27:40 srv sshd[98151]: Connection closed by invalid user 666666 175.137.104.57 port 61479 [preauth]
........
-----------------------------------------------
https://www.blocklist.de/en/view.html?ip=175.137.104.57 |
2020-10-03 12:21:30 |
| 46.101.7.41 |
attackbots |
20 attempts against mh-ssh on air |
2020-10-03 07:19:11 |
| 41.207.7.240 |
attackspambots |
Lines containing failures of 41.207.7.240
Oct 2 22:24:45 new sshd[31337]: Did not receive identification string from 41.207.7.240 port 57604
Oct 2 22:24:45 new sshd[31338]: Did not receive identification string from 41.207.7.240 port 57607
Oct 2 22:24:48 new sshd[31341]: Did not receive identification string from 41.207.7.240 port 57651
Oct 2 22:24:48 new sshd[31339]: Invalid user dircreate from 41.207.7.240 port 57884
Oct 2 22:24:48 new sshd[31339]: pam_unix(sshd:auth): authentication failure; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=41.207.7.240
Oct 2 22:24:50 new sshd[31339]: Failed password for invalid user dircreate from 41.207.7.240 port 57884 ssh2
Oct 2 22:24:50 new sshd[31343]: Invalid user dircreate from 41.207.7.240 port 57893
Oct 2 22:24:50 new sshd[31343]: pam_unix(sshd:auth): authentication failure; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=41.207.7.240
Oct 2 22:24:50 new sshd[31339]: Connection closed by invalid user dircreate 41.207.7.240 port ........
------------------------------ |
2020-10-03 12:07:22 |
| 160.124.103.55 |
attack |
Oct 3 05:28:26 abendstille sshd\[29296\]: Invalid user service from 160.124.103.55
Oct 3 05:28:26 abendstille sshd\[29296\]: pam_unix\(sshd:auth\): authentication failure\; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=160.124.103.55
Oct 3 05:28:29 abendstille sshd\[29296\]: Failed password for invalid user service from 160.124.103.55 port 36864 ssh2
Oct 3 05:31:38 abendstille sshd\[32475\]: Invalid user josh from 160.124.103.55
Oct 3 05:31:38 abendstille sshd\[32475\]: pam_unix\(sshd:auth\): authentication failure\; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=160.124.103.55
... |
2020-10-03 12:03:43 |
| 46.101.5.144 |
attack |
20 attempts against mh-ssh on soil |
2020-10-03 07:21:27 |
| 1.255.48.197 |
attack |
(From annabelle@merchantpay.top) I have a quick question about working with your business. Like most business owners you just want to survive through to 2021. In order for that to happen you need to save every dollar possible right? This is an honest question, would you continue with the high credit card processing fees if there was another way? New laws are on your side. Test this newly released card processing model this October - just send a phone number and we'll call.
$24.99/mo Flat Fee Credit Card Processing (Unlimited)
1) As a small business owner accepting credit/debit, recently passed State Laws are on your side. - Were you aware?
New state regulations now in effect, the law was successfully passed in 46 states - effective since August 2019.
Since that date you shouldn't be paying above 0.75% Credit Card Processing Fees.
2) You're legally able to demand this new option.
Bottom Line: Your processor isn't telling you everything. Why are they hiding the lower fee options?
We repre |
2020-10-03 12:17:46 |