Must be a valid IPv4 or IPv6 ip address, e.g. 127.0.0.1 or 2001:DB8:0:0:8:800:200C:417A
Basic Info

City: Birigui

Region: Sao Paulo

Country: Brazil

Internet Service Provider: unknown

Hostname: unknown

Organization: unknown

Usage Type: unknown

Comments:
No discussion about this IP yet. Click above link to make one.
Comments on same subnet:
No discussion about this subnet yet..
Whois info:
b
Dig info:
; <<>> DiG 9.10.3-P4-Ubuntu <<>> 45.70.85.19
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NXDOMAIN, id: 27897
;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 1, ADDITIONAL: 0

;; QUESTION SECTION:
;45.70.85.19.			IN	A

;; AUTHORITY SECTION:
.			193	IN	SOA	a.root-servers.net. nstld.verisign-grs.com. 2022061503 1800 900 604800 86400

;; Query time: 20 msec
;; SERVER: 183.60.83.19#53(183.60.83.19)
;; WHEN: Thu Jun 16 09:40:10 CST 2022
;; MSG SIZE  rcvd: 104
Host info
Host 19.85.70.45.in-addr.arpa. not found: 3(NXDOMAIN)
Nslookup info:
Server:		183.60.83.19
Address:	183.60.83.19#53

** server can't find 19.85.70.45.in-addr.arpa: NXDOMAIN
Related IP info:
Related comments:
IP Type Details Datetime
177.69.237.49 attackbotsspam
$f2bV_matches
2019-11-04 20:44:36
36.91.24.27 attackspambots
no
2019-11-04 20:52:28
165.22.89.249 attack
...
2019-11-04 20:51:08
192.241.249.19 attack
Nov  4 12:55:29 MK-Soft-Root2 sshd[13739]: pam_unix(sshd:auth): authentication failure; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=192.241.249.19 
Nov  4 12:55:31 MK-Soft-Root2 sshd[13739]: Failed password for invalid user zui from 192.241.249.19 port 60865 ssh2
...
2019-11-04 20:48:38
121.142.111.86 attackspam
Nov  4 10:25:12 XXX sshd[34662]: Invalid user ofsaa from 121.142.111.86 port 36966
2019-11-04 21:00:19
60.169.95.215 attackbotsspam
Nov  4 07:12:19 mxgate1 postfix/postscreen[19168]: CONNECT from [60.169.95.215]:56248 to [176.31.12.44]:25
Nov  4 07:12:19 mxgate1 postfix/dnsblog[19199]: addr 60.169.95.215 listed by domain cbl.abuseat.org as 127.0.0.2
Nov  4 07:12:19 mxgate1 postfix/dnsblog[19201]: addr 60.169.95.215 listed by domain zen.spamhaus.org as 127.0.0.4
Nov  4 07:12:19 mxgate1 postfix/dnsblog[19201]: addr 60.169.95.215 listed by domain zen.spamhaus.org as 127.0.0.11
Nov  4 07:12:19 mxgate1 postfix/dnsblog[19207]: addr 60.169.95.215 listed by domain b.barracudacentral.org as 127.0.0.2
Nov  4 07:12:25 mxgate1 postfix/postscreen[19168]: DNSBL rank 4 for [60.169.95.215]:56248
Nov x@x
Nov  4 07:12:26 mxgate1 postfix/postscreen[19168]: DISCONNECT [60.169.95.215]:56248


........
-----------------------------------------------
https://www.blocklist.de/en/view.html?ip=60.169.95.215
2019-11-04 21:20:27
125.62.213.94 attackbotsspam
email spam
2019-11-04 21:02:23
113.78.149.203 attack
Unauthorised access (Nov  4) SRC=113.78.149.203 LEN=40 TOS=0x10 PREC=0x40 TTL=51 ID=49095 TCP DPT=23 WINDOW=39781 SYN
2019-11-04 21:18:10
59.92.216.207 attack
Unauthorised access (Nov  4) SRC=59.92.216.207 LEN=52 PREC=0x20 TTL=110 ID=10611 DF TCP DPT=445 WINDOW=8192 SYN 
Unauthorised access (Nov  4) SRC=59.92.216.207 LEN=52 PREC=0x20 TTL=110 ID=7081 DF TCP DPT=445 WINDOW=8192 SYN
2019-11-04 20:57:44
198.46.225.100 attackspambots
(From eric@talkwithcustomer.com) Hey,

You have a website naturalhealthdcs.com, right?

Of course you do. I am looking at your website now.

It gets traffic every day – that you’re probably spending $2 / $4 / $10 or more a click to get.  Not including all of the work you put into creating social media, videos, blog posts, emails, and so on.

So you’re investing seriously in getting people to that site.

But how’s it working?  Great? Okay?  Not so much?

If that answer could be better, then it’s likely you’re putting a lot of time, effort, and money into an approach that’s not paying off like it should.

Now… imagine doubling your lead conversion in just minutes… In fact, I’ll go even better.
 
You could actually get up to 100X more conversions!

I’m not making this up.  As Chris Smith, best-selling author of The Conversion Code says: Speed is essential - there is a 100x decrease in Leads when a Lead is contacted within 14 minutes vs being contacted within 5 minutes.

He’s backed up by a st
2019-11-04 21:06:21
190.115.1.49 attackbots
Nov  4 03:21:29 ws22vmsma01 sshd[146611]: pam_unix(sshd:auth): authentication failure; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=190.115.1.49
Nov  4 03:21:30 ws22vmsma01 sshd[146611]: Failed password for invalid user semira from 190.115.1.49 port 48688 ssh2
...
2019-11-04 21:13:42
106.12.189.235 attackspam
failed root login
2019-11-04 21:12:00
202.169.62.187 attack
Repeated brute force against a port
2019-11-04 20:40:43
185.209.0.18 attackspam
185.209.0.18 was recorded 7 times by 2 hosts attempting to connect to the following ports: 23308,23346,23340,23392,23327,23357,23331. Incident counter (4h, 24h, all-time): 7, 47, 192
2019-11-04 21:22:56
193.68.19.34 attack
email spam
2019-11-04 20:52:11

Recently Reported IPs

41.215.116.221 46.10.230.8 169.229.239.155 169.229.123.149
169.229.119.27 169.229.121.33 169.229.127.135 169.229.125.156
169.229.224.39 169.229.225.27 169.229.130.230 169.229.126.165
169.229.131.101 37.191.94.58 169.229.128.251 169.229.129.4
169.229.129.14 169.229.129.50 169.229.129.59 196.44.176.39