Must be a valid IPv4 or IPv6 ip address, e.g. 127.0.0.1 or 2001:DB8:0:0:8:800:200C:417A
Basic Info

City: Wuhan

Region: Hubei

Country: China

Internet Service Provider: China Unicom

Hostname: unknown

Organization: unknown

Usage Type: unknown

Comments:
No discussion about this IP yet. Click above link to make one.
Comments on same subnet:
No discussion about this subnet yet..
Whois info:
b
Dig info:
; <<>> DiG 9.10.3-P4-Ubuntu <<>> 58.19.118.80
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NXDOMAIN, id: 10208
;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 1, ADDITIONAL: 0

;; QUESTION SECTION:
;58.19.118.80.			IN	A

;; AUTHORITY SECTION:
.			30	IN	SOA	a.root-servers.net. nstld.verisign-grs.com. 2024121100 1800 900 604800 86400

;; Query time: 12 msec
;; SERVER: 183.60.83.19#53(183.60.83.19)
;; WHEN: Thu Dec 12 00:09:05 CST 2024
;; MSG SIZE  rcvd: 105
Host info
b'Host 80.118.19.58.in-addr.arpa not found: 2(SERVFAIL)
'
Nslookup info:
;; Got SERVFAIL reply from 183.60.83.19, trying next server
Server:		183.60.82.98
Address:	183.60.82.98#53

** server can't find 80.118.19.58.in-addr.arpa: SERVFAIL
Related IP info:
Related comments:
IP Type Details Datetime
139.9.131.58 attack
Sep 22 18:46:51 nxxxxxxx0 sshd[20522]: reveeclipse mapping checking getaddrinfo for ecs-139-9-131-58.compute.hwclouds-dns.com [139.9.131.58] failed - POSSIBLE BREAK-IN ATTEMPT!
Sep 22 18:46:51 nxxxxxxx0 sshd[20522]: pam_unix(sshd:auth): authentication failure; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=139.9.131.58  user=r.r
Sep 22 18:46:53 nxxxxxxx0 sshd[20522]: Failed password for r.r from 139.9.131.58 port 47748 ssh2
Sep 22 18:46:53 nxxxxxxx0 sshd[20522]: Received disconnect from 139.9.131.58: 11: Bye Bye [preauth]
Sep 22 18:48:09 nxxxxxxx0 sshd[20638]: reveeclipse mapping checking getaddrinfo for ecs-139-9-131-58.compute.hwclouds-dns.com [139.9.131.58] failed - POSSIBLE BREAK-IN ATTEMPT!
Sep 22 18:48:09 nxxxxxxx0 sshd[20638]: pam_unix(sshd:auth): authentication failure; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=139.9.131.58  user=r.r
Sep 22 18:48:11 nxxxxxxx0 sshd[20638]: Failed password for r.r from 139.9.131.58 port 33564 ssh2
Sep 22 18:48:11 nxxxxxxx0 sshd[20638........
-------------------------------
2020-09-23 06:19:56
212.195.194.166 attackspambots
Lines containing failures of 212.195.194.166
Sep 22 18:42:51 ntop sshd[14683]: Invalid user pi from 212.195.194.166 port 59698
Sep 22 18:42:51 ntop sshd[14684]: Invalid user pi from 212.195.194.166 port 59700
Sep 22 18:42:51 ntop sshd[14683]: pam_unix(sshd:auth): authentication failure; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=212.195.194.166 
Sep 22 18:42:51 ntop sshd[14684]: pam_unix(sshd:auth): authentication failure; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=212.195.194.166 
Sep 22 18:42:53 ntop sshd[14683]: Failed password for invalid user pi from 212.195.194.166 port 59698 ssh2
Sep 22 18:42:53 ntop sshd[14684]: Failed password for invalid user pi from 212.195.194.166 port 59700 ssh2


........
-----------------------------------------------
https://www.blocklist.de/en/view.html?ip=212.195.194.166
2020-09-23 05:52:37
188.166.172.189 attackspambots
(sshd) Failed SSH login from 188.166.172.189 (GB/United Kingdom/montem.io): 5 in the last 3600 secs
2020-09-23 05:56:38
217.182.68.147 attackbots
$f2bV_matches
2020-09-23 06:13:19
52.152.168.203 attack
Criminal Connection Attempt(s) On Port 3389 Referred For Investigation
2020-09-23 05:59:02
161.97.117.104 attackbotsspam
(From nick@send.sohbetlal.com) I wanted to ask a question about your business.
1) As a business owner, new laws are on your side - effective starting August 2019. Were you aware? 

Since that date you shouldn't be paying above 0.75% Credit Card Processing Fees. 
2) You're legally able to demand this new option. 

Bottom Line: Your processor isn't telling you everything. Why are they hiding the lower fee options?

We represent merchants challenging their credit card processors. 
3) Merchants working with us demand to be switched to Unlimited Flat-Fee Processing.
 - Unlimited Flat-Fee Processing for $24.99 per month. 

The new terminals make it easy. And it's UNLIMITED.
4) Process any amount of cards for the same flat price each month.
No contracts. No surprises. No hidden fees.
We'll even start you off with a terminal at no cost.

September 2020 Limited Time Promotion:
Email back today to qualify:
- Free Equipment (Maximum 2x Terminals).
- No Contracts.
- No Cancellation Fees.
- Try Witho
2020-09-23 06:18:07
123.18.71.137 attack
Port scan on 1 port(s): 445
2020-09-23 05:56:53
27.72.172.195 attackbots
Unauthorized connection attempt from IP address 27.72.172.195 on Port 445(SMB)
2020-09-23 06:01:22
201.22.230.132 attackbotsspam
Unauthorized connection attempt from IP address 201.22.230.132 on Port 445(SMB)
2020-09-23 06:20:55
194.169.190.228 attack
Automatic report - Port Scan Attack
2020-09-23 06:14:30
132.145.158.230 attackbots
$f2bV_matches
2020-09-23 05:55:25
184.72.65.244 attackbots
Automatic report - Port Scan
2020-09-23 06:11:30
122.144.134.27 attackspam
Sep 22 19:04:08 melroy-server sshd[17373]: pam_unix(sshd:auth): authentication failure; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=122.144.134.27 
Sep 22 19:04:10 melroy-server sshd[17373]: Failed password for invalid user lf from 122.144.134.27 port 25154 ssh2
...
2020-09-23 06:30:31
81.68.209.225 attack
Sep 22 21:38:00 *** sshd[11793]: Invalid user pop from 81.68.209.225
2020-09-23 05:55:03
94.25.169.100 attackbots
Unauthorized connection attempt from IP address 94.25.169.100 on Port 445(SMB)
2020-09-23 05:54:42

Recently Reported IPs

104.247.124.146 108.97.61.121 154.84.103.128 96.168.85.185
136.224.26.240 130.92.123.2 199.175.136.39 56.221.195.233
77.29.152.116 104.50.94.238 69.206.228.229 6.217.246.228
193.169.141.81 202.5.241.254 3.28.202.41 190.89.0.55
220.147.244.251 224.230.166.201 35.175.31.193 231.251.34.71