City: unknown
Region: unknown
Country: United States of America (the)
Internet Service Provider: unknown
Hostname: unknown
Organization: unknown
Usage Type: unknown
b; <<>> DiG 9.10.3-P4-Ubuntu <<>> 74.106.57.85
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NXDOMAIN, id: 30820
;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 1, ADDITIONAL: 0
;; QUESTION SECTION:
;74.106.57.85. IN A
;; AUTHORITY SECTION:
. 30 IN SOA a.root-servers.net. nstld.verisign-grs.com. 2025021800 1800 900 604800 86400
;; Query time: 13 msec
;; SERVER: 183.60.83.19#53(183.60.83.19)
;; WHEN: Tue Feb 18 23:47:42 CST 2025
;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 105Host 85.57.106.74.in-addr.arpa. not found: 3(NXDOMAIN)Server: 183.60.83.19
Address: 183.60.83.19#53
** server can't find 85.57.106.74.in-addr.arpa: NXDOMAIN| IP | Type | Details | Datetime |
|---|---|---|---|
| 162.243.128.166 | attackspam | Port Scan ... |
2020-10-03 20:10:45 |
| 175.24.147.134 | attackspam | SSH login attempts. |
2020-10-03 20:00:37 |
| 52.149.15.223 | attackspam | TCP port : 8089 |
2020-10-03 20:07:16 |
| 207.244.252.113 | attackspambots | (From annabelle@merchantpay.top) I have a quick question about working with your business. Like most business owners you just want to survive through to 2021. In order for that to happen you need to save every dollar possible right? This is an honest question, would you continue with the high credit card processing fees if there was another way? New laws are on your side. Test this newly released card processing model this October - just send a phone number and we'll call. $24.99/mo Flat Fee Credit Card Processing (Unlimited) 1) As a small business owner accepting credit/debit, recently passed State Laws are on your side. - Were you aware? New state regulations now in effect, the law was successfully passed in 46 states - effective since August 2019. Since that date you shouldn't be paying above 0.75% Credit Card Processing Fees. 2) You're legally able to demand this new option. Bottom Line: Your processor isn't telling you everything. Why are they hiding the lower fee options? We repre |
2020-10-03 20:02:21 |
| 157.245.189.108 | attack | Oct 3 14:05:04 nopemail auth.info sshd[16159]: Invalid user bharat from 157.245.189.108 port 42094 ... |
2020-10-03 20:15:18 |
| 66.70.189.203 | attackspam | $f2bV_matches |
2020-10-03 20:09:46 |
| 119.254.155.39 | attackspam | 504 Authentication not enabled. |
2020-10-03 20:01:01 |
| 89.87.18.188 | attackbots | Oct 2 22:33:20 vps647732 sshd[1867]: pam_unix(sshd:auth): authentication failure; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=89.87.18.188 Oct 2 22:33:22 vps647732 sshd[1867]: Failed password for invalid user tit0nich from 89.87.18.188 port 50431 ssh2 ... |
2020-10-03 20:05:06 |
| 46.187.38.244 | attackbots |
|
2020-10-03 19:53:34 |
| 145.239.85.21 | attackbotsspam | 2020-10-03T08:37:25.533789amanda2.illicoweb.com sshd\[36012\]: Invalid user ale from 145.239.85.21 port 46395 2020-10-03T08:37:25.540480amanda2.illicoweb.com sshd\[36012\]: pam_unix\(sshd:auth\): authentication failure\; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=21.ip-145-239-85.eu 2020-10-03T08:37:27.414005amanda2.illicoweb.com sshd\[36012\]: Failed password for invalid user ale from 145.239.85.21 port 46395 ssh2 2020-10-03T08:44:31.322928amanda2.illicoweb.com sshd\[36531\]: pam_unix\(sshd:auth\): authentication failure\; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=21.ip-145-239-85.eu user=root 2020-10-03T08:44:33.346629amanda2.illicoweb.com sshd\[36531\]: Failed password for root from 145.239.85.21 port 38124 ssh2 ... |
2020-10-03 20:13:38 |
| 111.229.78.199 | attackspambots | Oct 3 08:57:24 sip sshd[1801619]: Invalid user afa from 111.229.78.199 port 40804 Oct 3 08:57:26 sip sshd[1801619]: Failed password for invalid user afa from 111.229.78.199 port 40804 ssh2 Oct 3 09:06:57 sip sshd[1801673]: Invalid user jim from 111.229.78.199 port 36550 ... |
2020-10-03 19:50:14 |
| 202.105.98.210 | attackspambots | Invalid user test1 from 202.105.98.210 port 54658 |
2020-10-03 20:20:56 |
| 218.92.0.207 | attackspambots | 2020-10-03T07:39:34.259095xentho-1 sshd[1152647]: Failed password for root from 218.92.0.207 port 42157 ssh2 2020-10-03T07:39:32.526825xentho-1 sshd[1152647]: pam_unix(sshd:auth): authentication failure; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=218.92.0.207 user=root 2020-10-03T07:39:34.259095xentho-1 sshd[1152647]: Failed password for root from 218.92.0.207 port 42157 ssh2 2020-10-03T07:39:37.397685xentho-1 sshd[1152647]: Failed password for root from 218.92.0.207 port 42157 ssh2 2020-10-03T07:39:32.526825xentho-1 sshd[1152647]: pam_unix(sshd:auth): authentication failure; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=218.92.0.207 user=root 2020-10-03T07:39:34.259095xentho-1 sshd[1152647]: Failed password for root from 218.92.0.207 port 42157 ssh2 2020-10-03T07:39:37.397685xentho-1 sshd[1152647]: Failed password for root from 218.92.0.207 port 42157 ssh2 2020-10-03T07:39:39.161540xentho-1 sshd[1152647]: Failed password for root from 218.92.0.207 port 42157 ssh2 2020-10-03T07:41:12.75 ... |
2020-10-03 19:52:17 |
| 49.235.84.250 | attack | sshd: Failed password for invalid user .... from 49.235.84.250 port 42370 ssh2 |
2020-10-03 19:52:59 |
| 208.109.13.144 | attackbots | Invalid user yt from 208.109.13.144 port 39024 |
2020-10-03 20:08:47 |