| 186.31.36.242 |
attackspam |
Oct 3 03:32:02 george sshd[6417]: Failed password for invalid user felipe from 186.31.36.242 port 35884 ssh2
Oct 3 03:36:15 george sshd[6441]: Invalid user albert from 186.31.36.242 port 34520
Oct 3 03:36:15 george sshd[6441]: pam_unix(sshd:auth): authentication failure; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=186.31.36.242
Oct 3 03:36:17 george sshd[6441]: Failed password for invalid user albert from 186.31.36.242 port 34520 ssh2
Oct 3 03:40:17 george sshd[6576]: Invalid user ark from 186.31.36.242 port 33158
... |
2020-10-03 19:35:14 |
| 207.244.252.113 |
attackspambots |
(From annabelle@merchantpay.top) I have a quick question about working with your business. Like most business owners you just want to survive through to 2021. In order for that to happen you need to save every dollar possible right? This is an honest question, would you continue with the high credit card processing fees if there was another way? New laws are on your side. Test this newly released card processing model this October - just send a phone number and we'll call.
$24.99/mo Flat Fee Credit Card Processing (Unlimited)
1) As a small business owner accepting credit/debit, recently passed State Laws are on your side. - Were you aware?
New state regulations now in effect, the law was successfully passed in 46 states - effective since August 2019.
Since that date you shouldn't be paying above 0.75% Credit Card Processing Fees.
2) You're legally able to demand this new option.
Bottom Line: Your processor isn't telling you everything. Why are they hiding the lower fee options?
We repre |
2020-10-03 20:02:21 |
| 202.153.37.194 |
attackbots |
Invalid user w from 202.153.37.194 port 32145 |
2020-10-03 20:06:08 |
| 167.172.214.147 |
attack |
Oct 3 13:12:08 PorscheCustomer sshd[24682]: pam_unix(sshd:auth): authentication failure; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=167.172.214.147
Oct 3 13:12:09 PorscheCustomer sshd[24682]: Failed password for invalid user bart from 167.172.214.147 port 39100 ssh2
Oct 3 13:13:19 PorscheCustomer sshd[24701]: pam_unix(sshd:auth): authentication failure; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=167.172.214.147
... |
2020-10-03 19:57:25 |
| 218.92.0.207 |
attackspambots |
2020-10-03T07:39:34.259095xentho-1 sshd[1152647]: Failed password for root from 218.92.0.207 port 42157 ssh2
2020-10-03T07:39:32.526825xentho-1 sshd[1152647]: pam_unix(sshd:auth): authentication failure; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=218.92.0.207 user=root
2020-10-03T07:39:34.259095xentho-1 sshd[1152647]: Failed password for root from 218.92.0.207 port 42157 ssh2
2020-10-03T07:39:37.397685xentho-1 sshd[1152647]: Failed password for root from 218.92.0.207 port 42157 ssh2
2020-10-03T07:39:32.526825xentho-1 sshd[1152647]: pam_unix(sshd:auth): authentication failure; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=218.92.0.207 user=root
2020-10-03T07:39:34.259095xentho-1 sshd[1152647]: Failed password for root from 218.92.0.207 port 42157 ssh2
2020-10-03T07:39:37.397685xentho-1 sshd[1152647]: Failed password for root from 218.92.0.207 port 42157 ssh2
2020-10-03T07:39:39.161540xentho-1 sshd[1152647]: Failed password for root from 218.92.0.207 port 42157 ssh2
2020-10-03T07:41:12.75
... |
2020-10-03 19:52:17 |
| 178.80.54.189 |
attackspam |
178.80.54.189 - - [02/Oct/2020:22:37:21 +0100] "POST /xmlrpc.php HTTP/1.1" 403 219 "-" "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.0)"
178.80.54.189 - - [02/Oct/2020:22:37:22 +0100] "POST /wp-login.php HTTP/1.1" 200 7644 "-" "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.0)"
178.80.54.189 - - [02/Oct/2020:22:38:22 +0100] "POST /xmlrpc.php HTTP/1.1" 403 219 "-" "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.0)"
... |
2020-10-03 19:47:50 |
| 117.50.107.175 |
attackspambots |
(sshd) Failed SSH login from 117.50.107.175 (CN/China/-): 5 in the last 3600 secs |
2020-10-03 19:56:01 |
| 42.200.148.195 |
attack |
TCP (SYN) 42.200.148.195:10932 -> port 23, len 44 |
2020-10-03 19:58:58 |
| 157.245.244.212 |
attackbots |
SSH brute-force attack detected from [157.245.244.212] |
2020-10-03 19:36:59 |
| 212.70.149.36 |
attackbotsspam |
Oct 3 13:57:48 s1 postfix/submission/smtpd\[6789\]: warning: unknown\[212.70.149.36\]: SASL LOGIN authentication failed: UGFzc3dvcmQ6
Oct 3 13:58:05 s1 postfix/submission/smtpd\[6789\]: warning: unknown\[212.70.149.36\]: SASL LOGIN authentication failed: UGFzc3dvcmQ6
Oct 3 13:58:24 s1 postfix/submission/smtpd\[6789\]: warning: unknown\[212.70.149.36\]: SASL LOGIN authentication failed: UGFzc3dvcmQ6
Oct 3 13:58:44 s1 postfix/submission/smtpd\[6789\]: warning: unknown\[212.70.149.36\]: SASL LOGIN authentication failed: UGFzc3dvcmQ6
Oct 3 13:59:10 s1 postfix/submission/smtpd\[6789\]: warning: unknown\[212.70.149.36\]: SASL LOGIN authentication failed: UGFzc3dvcmQ6
Oct 3 13:59:29 s1 postfix/submission/smtpd\[6789\]: warning: unknown\[212.70.149.36\]: SASL LOGIN authentication failed: UGFzc3dvcmQ6
Oct 3 13:59:49 s1 postfix/submission/smtpd\[6789\]: warning: unknown\[212.70.149.36\]: SASL LOGIN authentication failed: UGFzc3dvcmQ6
Oct 3 14:00:15 s1 postfix/submission/smtpd\[13467\]: warning: unknown\[212.70. |
2020-10-03 20:04:39 |
| 106.75.241.200 |
attackspam |
Invalid user oracle from 106.75.241.200 port 58696 |
2020-10-03 19:48:22 |
| 63.80.187.59 |
attackbots |
E-Mail Spam (RBL) [REJECTED] |
2020-10-03 19:37:35 |
| 5.154.243.131 |
attack |
$f2bV_matches |
2020-10-03 19:28:01 |
| 174.217.20.86 |
attack |
Brute forcing email accounts |
2020-10-03 19:26:45 |
| 45.227.255.204 |
attackspambots |
TCP (SYN) 45.227.255.204:56334 -> port 1080, len 60 |
2020-10-03 19:49:07 |